ArticlePublic health challenges2025
Classifying Internet Addiction Using Machine Learning Approach: A Study Among Adolescents in Bangladesh.
Article in Public health challenges, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Classifying Internet Addiction Using Machine Learning Approach: A Study Among Adolescents in Bangladesh.Public health challenges · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Internet addiction (IA) among adolescents is growing worldwide. Online temptation is particularly strong for adolescents due to rapid physical and cognitive development. IA may impair their mental, emotional, social, and physical health. Few traditional studies were conducted in Bangladesh. Thus, this study aimed to identify adolescents' IA risk factors using advanced machine learning (ML). Methods: A total of 385 individuals were convenience sampled and surveyed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), the UCLA Loneliness Scale (UCLA-3), and Young's IA Test (IAT-20) to measure the prevalence of depression, loneliness, and IA. Boruta found IA prevalence classifying factors. We evaluated decision tree (DT), support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR), and random forest (RF) classification models using confusion matrix, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and Results: Among 385 respondents, one-third (30.1%) reported IA. Participants' fathers' education, favorite activity, loneliness, smoking status, depression, and internet use time were selected as important features classifying IA. The performance was tested on the basis of five different classification techniques overall: the SVM linear kernel model (accuracy = 0.819, specificity = 0.869, sensitivity = 0.687, precision = 0.666, area under the ROC curve [AUC] = 0.890, Conclusion: Raising awareness among adolescents and their parents is crucial because IA is frequent. The ML framework can identify significant prognostic indicators and classify this IA problem more accurately, helping policymakers, stakeholders, and families understand and prevent this crisis by improving policy-making strategies and counseling services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.