Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41244624›Full record

ArticlePublic health challenges2025

Knowledge, Attitude and Practices of Abattoir Workers in Kumasi Towards Ticks and Tick-Borne Pathogens.

Seth Offei Addo, Margaret Addo, Michael E DeWitt, Christopher Nii Laryea Tawiah-Mensah, Stacy Amoah, Patrick Kwasi Obuam, Nancy Martekai Unicorn, Emmanuella Tiwaa Kyeremateng, Genevieve Desewu, John Asiedu Larbi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health challenges, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Seth Offei AddoParasitology Department Noguchi Memorial Institute For Medical Research University of Ghana Accra Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4470-4504
Margaret AddoDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Ghana Medical School University of Ghana Accra Ghana.
Michael E DeWittDepartment of Internal Medicine Section on Infectious Diseases Wake Forest University School of Medicine Winston-Salem North Carolina USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8940-1967
Christopher Nii Laryea Tawiah-MensahParasitology Department Noguchi Memorial Institute For Medical Research University of Ghana Accra Ghana.
Stacy AmoahParasitology Department Noguchi Memorial Institute For Medical Research University of Ghana Accra Ghana.
Patrick Kwasi ObuamSchool of Public Health Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology Kumasi Ghana.
Nancy Martekai UnicornDepartment of Theoretical and Applied Biology College of Science KNUST Kumasi Ghana.
Emmanuella Tiwaa KyerematengDepartment of Theoretical and Applied Biology College of Science KNUST Kumasi Ghana.
Genevieve DesewuDepartment of Theoretical and Applied Biology College of Science KNUST Kumasi Ghana.
John Asiedu LarbiDepartment of Theoretical and Applied Biology College of Science KNUST Kumasi Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2396-0269

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The high dependence on livestock in Ghana comes with the risk of zoonotic tick-borne pathogen infection. Abattoir workers are especially at risk due to their frequent contact with livestock that are infested with ticks and tick-borne pathogens. This study sought to assess the knowledge, attitude and practices of abattoir workers in Kumasi towards ticks and tick-borne pathogens. A total of 130 workers were recruited from the Kumasi abattoir (92), Suame abattoir (24) and Akwatia Line slaughter slab (14). The respondents were males, mostly aged between 46 and 55 years (36.2%), had no form of education (43.8%) and had >10 years (68.5%) of working experience. Given that a significant number of the workers handled live animals (95.4%) or dead animals or animal parts (87.7%), were involved in slaughtering (69.2%) and had experienced tick bites (81.5%), there was a risk of tick-borne pathogen infection. However, only 35.4% thought humans can get diseases from tick bites, and 58.5% of the respondents believed tick bites lead to the development of a tick-borne disease. It was observed that education (

Indexed as

abattoirGhanatickszoonoses

Identifiers

PMID41244624
PMCPMC12617350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.