ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025
FMEA based prescriptive model for equipment repair guidance.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Accurate prediction of steps required to address machine faults is critical for minimizing downtime and enhancing production efficiency in modern manufacturing. This study utilizes machine failure data and Failure Mode and Effects Analysis to demonstrate how machine learning supports maintenance teams in selecting optimal repair methods. Methods: The research adopts the Design Science Research paradigm, which emphasizes the creation of artifacts to address practical challenges. For the practical component, quality assurance and control frameworks in data science projects were implemented by integrating two widely used methodologies: CRISP-DM and PDCA, to ensure rigorous quality assurance and control in data science initiatives. Results: Repair actions serve as the target variables, while the input comprises ten multivariate time-series machine parameters. The prediction task is formulated as a classification problem. Two modeling approaches are evaluated. The first approach merges multiple time series into a single sequence, facilitating the application of Multi-Layer Perceptron, Convolutional Neural Networks, and Fully Convolutional Networks. The second approach preserves the time series as three-dimensional arrays, enabling advanced applications of MLP, CNN, Multi-Head CNN, and FCN models. Discussion: The models are assessed based on their capacity to predict repair actions, with particular emphasis on the impact of time-series processing and model architecture on classification accuracy. The findings highlight effective strategies for predicting machine repairs and advancing prescriptive maintenance in manufacturing environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.