ArticleiScience2025
Transcriptomic comparison of avian auditory and vestibular sensory epithelia.
Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our inner ears contain various hair cell subtypes with distinct cytomorphologies, innervation, and functions. Here, we computationally compared hair cell transcriptomes from the avian hearing organ, the basilar papilla, and the utricle, a vestibular organ, to explore how these subtypes differ in gene expression within a single species. We identified distinct gene expression patterns in auditory and vestibular hair cell subgroups. Next, we integrated existing transcriptomic datasets from regenerated nascent auditory hair cells and nascent utricle hair cells arising during natural turnover. We found that while nascent hair cells possess unique transcriptomic profiles, they are more similar to utricular type II hair cells than to their mature functional counterparts. Additionally, three weeks after aminoglycoside-induced hair cell loss in the utricle, the regenerated hair cells lacked type I hair cell gene expression properties. This study provides fundamental insights into avian hair cell diversity and offers a basis for cross-species comparative studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.