ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2025
The role of Lymphadenectomy in early-stage mucinous Ovarian Cancer.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting recurrence in epithelial ovarian cancer after primary cytoreductive surgery: A single-center retrospective study.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the effect of lymphadenectomy on morbidity and survival in patients with early-stage mucinous ovarian cancer. Methodology: Patients with clinical stage-I primary mucinous ovarian cancer who underwent surgery in the gynecological oncology clinic of Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey between January 1998 to December 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups according to whether lymphadenectomy (pelvic ± para-aortic) was performed or not. The groups were compared in terms of clinical variables. Results: Forty-five patients were examined. Lymphadenectomy was performed in 30 (66.7%) patients. Metastasis was not detected in any of the lymph nodes. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of age, menopausal status, stage, tumor grade, bilaterality, ascites, tumor size and preoperative cancer antigen 125, carbohydrate antigen 19-9, carcinoembryonic antigen. Patients who underwent lymphadenectomy had longer durations of operation time and hospital stay (p<0.001 and p=0.011, respectively). The median follow-up time was 96 (3-240) months. Recurrence developed in two (4.4%) patients. The five-year disease-free survival rates of the groups with and without lymphadenectomy were 96.4% and 92.9%, respectively (p=0.666). The five-year overall survival rates of the groups with and without lymphadenectomy were calculated as 96.4% and 92.9%, respectively (p=0.666). Conclusions: The risk of lymph node metastasis is very low in early-stage mucinous ovarian cancer. Lymphadenectomy causes an increase in the duration of operation and hospital stay and does not contribute to disease-free and overall survival. Therefore, routine lymphadenectomy should be carefully evaluated in clinical early-stage mucinous ovarian cancer to reduce morbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.