ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2025
Gender predisposition in patient attitudes and preferences during dental treatment - A mixed method study from Lahore, Pakistan.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Existence of gender bias in clinical dentistry: A cross-sectional study on Perception and experience of dental clinicians at a private dental institute in Lahore.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate predispositions, focusing on the impact of the gender of dentists on patient attitudes and exploring how these predispositions affect dental care. Methods: A cross-sectional, mixed-method study was planned that surveyed 383 patients from July 2023 to July 2024 at three private dental hospitals in Lahore, Pakistan. A combination of quantitative and qualitative data collection techniques was used, including thematically transcribing recordings to identify recurring themes related to gender predispositions in dental care. Results: The study found significant gender-based preferences; male dentists were preferred for attributes like decisiveness, experience, and time management, with 37% (n=142) respondents viewing them as more confident and experienced. Female dentists were favored for aesthetics, sensitivity, and preventive care, with 44% (n=172) appreciating their attention to detail and 52% (n=201) valuing their sensitivity and caring nature. Substantial associations were seen for attention to aesthetics (p ≤ 0.04), concern for cleanliness (p ≤ 0.03), multiple visits (p ≤ 0.00), sharing dental fears (p ≤ 0.00), discussing general health (p ≤ 0.00) and financial issues (p ≤ 0.00), and understanding problems (p ≤ 0.00). Qualitative analysis found preferences under five themes including comfort level, perception of competence, cultural and religious factors, trust and confidence in treatment, bias and stereotypes. Conclusion: The study findings highlight gender predispositions in dental care, influenced by cultural stereotypes. Addressing these biases is crucial for improving patient satisfaction and ensuring equitable treatment. The study further suggests that both patients and dental professionals should focus on qualifications and skills rather than gender, with further research needed to explore the deeper impact of these predispositions on patient perceptions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.