Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41244421›Full record

ArticleACS omega2025

Establishing a Protocol to Characterize Sludge from Oil and Water Lines.

Gustavo G Celestino, Júlia Veiga Nunes, Elizabete F Lucas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gustavo G CelestinoPrograma de Engenharia Metalúrgica e de Materiais/COPPE/LADPOL, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Av. Horácio Macedo, 2030, bloco F, Rio de Janeiro 21941598, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1002-8878
Júlia Veiga NunesInstituto de Macromoléculas/LMCP, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rua Moniz Aragão, 360, bloco 8G/CT2, Rio de Janeiro 21941594, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Elizabete F LucasPrograma de Engenharia Metalúrgica e de Materiais/COPPE/LADPOL, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Av. Horácio Macedo, 2030, bloco F, Rio de Janeiro 21941598, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9454-9517

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During well drilling, production, processing, transportation, and refining of the crude oil, it is common to observe sludge formation, which can contain several kinds of compounds, such as organic compounds of the oil and inorganic compounds generated during oil and/or water production. There are many procedures to prevent organic and inorganic deposition; however, to apply suitable procedures, it is necessary to identify the cause of the sludge formation. This can be achieved through a detailed sludge characterization. This study presents a sequence of techniques to characterize different kinds of industrial sludges and proposes the causes of the formation of each of them. The techniques used involved thermogravimetric analysis, successive solvent extractions, microcalorimetry, sulfide test, X-ray fluorescence, X-ray diffraction, and scanning electron microscopy. The sequence of the analyses was presented considering the amount of sample available. Four industrial sludge samples were used, two from an oil production line and two from a water production line. The protocol established to characterize the sludge was shown to be useful to identify the cause of the deposition. The main causes detected in the samples analyzed were asphaltene deposition, inorganic deposition, and inorganic compounds formed by hydrogen sulfide and corrosion products.

Identifiers

PMID41244421
PMCPMC12612967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.