ArticleJournal of asthma and allergy2025
A 21-Practice Evaluation of an Asthma and COPD Quality Improvement Program.
Article in Journal of asthma and allergy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the Achieving Clinical Audits with Electronic Records (ACAER) program in supporting primary care providers in quality improvement initiatives across asthma and COPD. Patients and methods: This observational cohort study included individuals aged ≥12 years with documented diagnosis of asthma or COPD, receiving asthma or COPD therapy, at high risk of exacerbation and hospitalization. Data were derived from the intervention, linked patient questionnaires completed as part of practice evaluation and quality improvement, and routine primary care electronic medical records (EMR) within the Optimum Patient Care Research Database Australia (OPCRDA). Changes in exacerbation rates and maintenance treatment were evaluated. Results: 7512 asthma and 6526 COPD patients were evaluated with EMR collection. A subset of 1327 asthma patients and 629 COPD patients were classified as active and high-risk. Patient questionnaires and evaluation reports were sent out between 29 October 2019 and 21 September 2021, the intervention period. For those at risk during the entire study period (2018-2023; N=1276), 48.4% and 59.3% of patients in the high-risk asthma and COPD populations, respectively, had maintenance therapy change in the first year post-intervention. Exacerbation rates fell after the intervention period in the high-risk asthma (74.8 to 32.4 per 1000 per month) and COPD (122.9 to 91.2 per 1000 per month) populations. High-risk asthma patients had increasing rates of exacerbations in the 2 years prior to the intervention period (linear trend: 2.79 exacerbations per 1000 per month [1.34, 4.24]; p=0.001), which declined and remained stable after the intervention (p=0.87; up to 2023). Exacerbation rates for high-risk COPD patients were stable pre-intervention (p=0.29). Post-intervention rates initially declined and then showed a marginal non-statistically significant increase (p=0.28). Conclusion: Our findings support the potential for the ACAER asthma and COPD program to drive treatment change and improve long-term outcomes in high-risk patients in primary care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.