Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41244373›Full record

ArticleJournal of asthma and allergy2025

Clinical, Biomarker, and Radiological Progression from Asthma to Systemic Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Chenyang Lu, Changxing Ou, Yu Deng, Na Li, Yuwen Ma, JinXi Luo, Jiaxuan Zhou, Kian Fan Chung, Zhenan Deng, Qingling Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of asthma and allergy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Chenyang Lu *State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Changxing Ou *State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Yu Deng *Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Na Li *Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Shenzhen Longgang Central Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Yuwen MaState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
JinXi LuoState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Jiaxuan ZhouDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Kian Fan ChungNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London SW3, UK; Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London SW3, UK.
Zhenan DengState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Qingling ZhangState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is a rare multi-organ autoimmune disease characterized by eosinophilic infiltration of peripheral blood and tissues, and necrotizing granulomatous inflammation of small and medium-sized blood vessels. In the prodromal stage of EGPA, patients may present with features of refractory asthma, with the involvement of other organs occurring later when the diagnosis of EGPA is made. The difficulty of early diagnosis makes treatment difficult. Methods: We retrospectively describe patients (N=13) who attended the asthma clinic at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University between 2008 and 2024. The disease course was categorized into three stages: asthma, lung-limited or lung-dominant EGPA (L-EGPA), and systemic EGPA (S-EGPA). Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma served as controls. We evaluated baseline demographic, as well as organ involvement, complication, laboratory findings, lung function, high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), and treatment across different disease stages. A case-crossover design and Bayesian conditional logistic regression were employed to evaluate the impact of medication use on disease progression. Results: We identified a group of EGPA patients who exhibited consistent disease progression to transit from asthma to L-EGPA, and eventually to S-EGPA. These stages exhibit distinct clinical and imaging features, with significantly elevated eosinophilic inflammatory markers in induced sputum or blood being a hallmark of L-EGPA. This distinction may aid in differentiating refractory asthma from L-EGPA. Conclusion: In conclusion, the L-EGPA phase may represent a distinct stage in EGPA development that is often challenging to distinguish from refractory asthma. Characterizing this phase and identifying specific biomarkers could facilitate earlier diagnosis and treatment, potentially improving patient outcomes-a hypothesis that warrants further validation.

Indexed as

asthmaeosinophiliaeosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitisrare pulmonary diseases

Identifiers

PMID41244373
PMCPMC12619547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.