ArticleJournal of nursing management2025
Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision, and Nurse Teacher Evaluation (CLES + T) Scale: Saudi Arabic Version-A Cross-Sectional Validation Study of Nursing Interns and Students.
Article in Journal of nursing management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Robust instruments are essential to evaluate the effectiveness of the hospital setting as a clinical learning environment for nursing interns and students, which is a crucial part of nursing education. Purpose: This study aimed to present a Saudi Arabic version of Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision, and Nurse Teacher Evaluation (CLES + T-SA) scale and to explore the clinical learning environment, supervision, and nurse teacher evaluation of nursing interns and students during their clinical practice training. Methods: A convenience sample of 280 nursing interns and students was employed into this study. Exploratory factor analysis using principal axis factoring method and Varimax rotation was conducted to determine the structure of the scale's Saudi Arabic version. Results: The CLES + T-SA was successfully cross-culturally adapted and has a strong construct validity and reliability showing exceptional internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.96) with the following three subscales having Cronbach's alphas: clinical learning environment (0.94), supervision (0.94), and nurse teacher evaluation (0.96). Supervision is the most critical variable that influenced the clinical learning experience of nursing students. Conclusion: The CLES + T-SA version validly and reliably assessed CLES + T evaluation and can be used by nursing students in Arab Gulf countries and other Arabic-speaking nursing interns and students. Implications for Practice: Measures are needed to train and equip clinical supervisors in teaching, supervising, guiding, coaching, and facilitating the development of nursing students in providing compassionate, safe, and high-quality care during clinical practice. The findings of this study are significant to nursing academe and hospital administrators for them to formulate strategies that will enhance the clinical learning environment, supervision, and teaching of nursing students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.