ReviewJPRAS open2025
Poly-4-hydroxybutyrate mesh (GalaFlex®) in aesthetic breast surgery: A comprehensive systematic review.
Review in JPRAS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Use of the periprosthetic capsule in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery: literature review and practical applications.Updates in surgery · 2026Review
- Clinical Characteristics and Use of Poly-4-Hydroxybutyrate Scaffold (GalaFLEX™) in Primary and Secondary Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Structured Review of the Literature and Preliminary Single-Center Experience.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Clinical Performance of GalaFLEX® (Poly-4-Hydroxybutyrate) Scaffold Application in Aesthetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery: A Retrospective Study.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Soft Tissue Scaffolds in Breast Reconstruction: Evolution from Acellular Dermal Matrices to Synthetic Polymers.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- AI-Driven Innovations for Quality Control and Standardization: Future Strategies in Adipose-Derived Stem Cell Manufacturing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Early Performance of a Multifilament Resorbable Synthetic Mesh in Aesthetic Breast Surgery: A 206 Patient Experience.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mastopexy, with or without implants, is a common cosmetic breast surgery. Despite various techniques, long-term issues like pseudoptosis and recurrent ptosis remain challenging, especially in patients with poor skin quality or significant weight loss. While autologous methods provide stability, they often fall short in complex cases. Therefore, non-autologous reinforcement, such as acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) and synthetic meshes, are increasingly used. This systematic review critically evaluates the efficacy, safety, and outcomes of P4HB mesh in aesthetic breast surgery, focusing on postoperative complications and patient satisfaction. Methods: This study followed Cochrane Handbook principles and PRISMA guidelines, with the protocol registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024506060). Analyzing 183 patients (366 breasts) across seven studies, high heterogeneity, the absence of a control group, and a significant risk of bias precluded the possibility of conducting a meta-analysis, resulting in a systematic review instead. Result: This review evaluated the use of P4HB scaffolds in various breast surgeries, including mastopexy, augmentation, and revision procedures. Findings demonstrated improvements in breast support and lower pole stability over time. Complications were minimal. However, the studies highlighted outcome variability and the need for standardized assessment tools to measure results. Conclusions: The P4HB mesh offers notable advantages, including high biocompatibility, long resorption time, and cost-effectiveness, making it a promising option for challenging cases in aesthetic breast surgery. It provides internal support for soft tissues and implants, especially where implant visibility is a concern. However, due to the variability in surgical procedures and the lack of robust evidence, solid conclusions about the optimal clinical use of P4HB meshes are still premature, necessitating further high-quality studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.