Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41244363›Full record

ReviewJPRAS open2025

Poly-4-hydroxybutyrate mesh (GalaFlex®) in aesthetic breast surgery: A comprehensive systematic review.

Marco Palmesano, Gabriele Storti, Andrea Lisa, Irene Nunziata, Mario Alessandri Bonetti, Riccardo Foti, Bong-Sung Kim, Carlo Cossi, Giulio Cervelli, Valerio Cervelli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JPRAS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marco PalmesanoDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Viale Oxford 81, Rome, 00133, Italy.
Gabriele StortiDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Viale Oxford 81, Rome, 00133, Italy.
Andrea LisaPhD Program in Applied Medical Surgical Sciences - Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Viale Oxford 81, Rome, 00133, Italy.
Irene NunziataDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Viale Oxford 81, Rome, 00133, Italy.
Mario Alessandri BonettiDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, Milan, 20122, Italy.
Riccardo FotiDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Viale Oxford 81, Rome, 00133, Italy.
Bong-Sung KimDepartment of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Carlo CossiDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Viale Oxford 81, Rome, 00133, Italy.
Giulio CervelliDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, 00133, Italy.
Valerio CervelliDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Viale Oxford 81, Rome, 00133, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Mastopexy, with or without implants, is a common cosmetic breast surgery. Despite various techniques, long-term issues like pseudoptosis and recurrent ptosis remain challenging, especially in patients with poor skin quality or significant weight loss. While autologous methods provide stability, they often fall short in complex cases. Therefore, non-autologous reinforcement, such as acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) and synthetic meshes, are increasingly used. This systematic review critically evaluates the efficacy, safety, and outcomes of P4HB mesh in aesthetic breast surgery, focusing on postoperative complications and patient satisfaction. Methods: This study followed Cochrane Handbook principles and PRISMA guidelines, with the protocol registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024506060). Analyzing 183 patients (366 breasts) across seven studies, high heterogeneity, the absence of a control group, and a significant risk of bias precluded the possibility of conducting a meta-analysis, resulting in a systematic review instead. Result: This review evaluated the use of P4HB scaffolds in various breast surgeries, including mastopexy, augmentation, and revision procedures. Findings demonstrated improvements in breast support and lower pole stability over time. Complications were minimal. However, the studies highlighted outcome variability and the need for standardized assessment tools to measure results. Conclusions: The P4HB mesh offers notable advantages, including high biocompatibility, long resorption time, and cost-effectiveness, making it a promising option for challenging cases in aesthetic breast surgery. It provides internal support for soft tissues and implants, especially where implant visibility is a concern. However, due to the variability in surgical procedures and the lack of robust evidence, solid conclusions about the optimal clinical use of P4HB meshes are still premature, necessitating further high-quality studies.

Indexed as

Aesthetic breast surgeryBreast surgeryMastopexyP4HB mesh

Identifiers

PMID41244363
PMCPMC12613037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.