ArticleJPRAS open2025
Preoperative detection of perforating vessels in autologous abdominal flap-based breast reconstruction using a smartphone-based thermography device.
Article in JPRAS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Abdominal-based microvascular perforator flaps remain the technique of choice in autologous breast reconstruction. Preoperative identification of the morphology, localization, and course of perforating vessels is of utmost importance. Various imaging modalities are currently used, including duplex sonography, computed tomography angiography, and magnetic resonance angiography. Thermography displays temperature variations on the skin surface and may help identify hotspots using a smartphone-based, handheld, low-cost device. This cross-sectional observational study evaluated such a thermography device and compared its accuracy with computed tomography and magnetic resonance angiography. Sixty patients undergoing abdominal tissue-based breast reconstruction between 2019 and 2022 were included. Preoperative skin perfusion was assessed using the device after cooling the abdominal skin with soaked towels at approximately 17 °C for five minutes, followed by spontaneous rewarming to room temperature. Thermographic images were taken at defined intervals. Hotspots were defined as the hottest 1 cm diameter areas on the skin surface. In patients with subcutaneous tissue thickness below 30 mm, hotspots at 3 min after cooling correlated with radiologically identified perforators in 42 percent of cases. In patients with thickness above 30 mm, the highest correlation (43 percent) was observed at 30 min. Across all timepoints, correlation ranged from 0 to 75 percent. Smartphone-based thermography provides a quick, non-invasive method to identify hotspots on the skin surface. However, correlation with computed tomography or magnetic resonance angiography was below 50 percent and highly dependent on subcutaneous thickness. As it does not show vessel caliber or intramuscular course, thermography cannot replace standard imaging but may serve as an adjunct.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.