Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41244362›Full record

ArticleJPRAS open2025

Preoperative detection of perforating vessels in autologous abdominal flap-based breast reconstruction using a smartphone-based thermography device.

Andrea Sm Alberti, Davide Brucato, Corrado Parodi, Daniel Schmauss, Yves Harder, Riccardo Schweizer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JPRAS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrea Sm AlbertiDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Lugano Regional Hospital, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Lugano, Switzerland.
Davide BrucatoDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Lugano Regional Hospital, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Lugano, Switzerland.
Corrado ParodiDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Lugano Regional Hospital, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Lugano, Switzerland.
Daniel SchmaussDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Lugano Regional Hospital, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Lugano, Switzerland.
Yves HarderDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Lugano Regional Hospital, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Lugano, Switzerland.
Riccardo SchweizerDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Lugano Regional Hospital, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Lugano, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abdominal-based microvascular perforator flaps remain the technique of choice in autologous breast reconstruction. Preoperative identification of the morphology, localization, and course of perforating vessels is of utmost importance. Various imaging modalities are currently used, including duplex sonography, computed tomography angiography, and magnetic resonance angiography. Thermography displays temperature variations on the skin surface and may help identify hotspots using a smartphone-based, handheld, low-cost device. This cross-sectional observational study evaluated such a thermography device and compared its accuracy with computed tomography and magnetic resonance angiography. Sixty patients undergoing abdominal tissue-based breast reconstruction between 2019 and 2022 were included. Preoperative skin perfusion was assessed using the device after cooling the abdominal skin with soaked towels at approximately 17 °C for five minutes, followed by spontaneous rewarming to room temperature. Thermographic images were taken at defined intervals. Hotspots were defined as the hottest 1 cm diameter areas on the skin surface. In patients with subcutaneous tissue thickness below 30 mm, hotspots at 3 min after cooling correlated with radiologically identified perforators in 42 percent of cases. In patients with thickness above 30 mm, the highest correlation (43 percent) was observed at 30 min. Across all timepoints, correlation ranged from 0 to 75 percent. Smartphone-based thermography provides a quick, non-invasive method to identify hotspots on the skin surface. However, correlation with computed tomography or magnetic resonance angiography was below 50 percent and highly dependent on subcutaneous thickness. As it does not show vessel caliber or intramuscular course, thermography cannot replace standard imaging but may serve as an adjunct.

Indexed as

Breast cancerComputed tomography angiographyDeep inferior epigastric artery perforator flapMagnetic resonance angiographyNon-invasive imagingPerforator flapsThermography

Identifiers

PMID41244362
PMCPMC12613052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.