ArticleJPRAS open2025
Establishing a best practice for the freeze-thaw cycle of cryopreservation to approximate living muscle, joint, and associated soft tissue properties in cadaveric upper limbs.
Article in JPRAS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Fresh-frozen cadavers are useful for surgical simulation and experimentation since they preserve many properties of live specimens, but achieving realistic physiological properties requires thawing that risks tissue damage. Methods: Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric upper limbs were frozen at -17 °C, refrigerated at 4 °C for 48 h, then thawed at room temperature for 8 h. The core temperature of the limbs was measured hourly. Joint flexibility, durometric hardness, and shore hardness were measured every two hours. Four limbs had muscle biopsies acquired every 2 h. Results: The limbs were above freezing after about 1 h of thawing. The upper limbs achieved a flexibility score of 3/5 after 2 h of thawing, mimicking healthy live limbs. The limbs became softer and more pliable with more time thawing. Muscle biopsies showed no tissue damage in any samples taken at h 2 and 4 of thawing. Three limbs showed no tissue damage at h 6 or 8, either. One limb had biopsies at 6 and 8 h demonstrating moderate to severe tissue damage. Conclusions: It was concluded that for ideal thawing, fresh-frozen cadaveric upper limbs should be thawed for 2 h after 48 h of refrigeration, permitting surgical simulation for 4 h after thawing, though potentially for 6 h.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.