ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2025
Improvement of machine learning models for predicting high-grade subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma based on delta radiomics: A multicenter cohort study.
Article in European journal of radiology open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of delta radiomics in predicting high-grade components in lung adenocarcinoma and to develop a robust machine learning model for clinical application. Methods: This retrospective multi-center cohort study included lung cancer patients from three hospitals who had pre-surgery CT follow-up scans. Training (n = 491) and validation (n = 210) were performed using cases from Center 1, and testing was conducted using cases from Centers 2 and 3 (n = 92). Radiomic features were extracted from baseline and follow-up CT images, and delta radiomic features were calculated. The LASSO algorithm was used for radiomic feature selection, and rad-score and delta rad-score were constructed. Significant clinical and radiomic features were combined to build the final machine learning model. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), DeLong test, decision curve analysis (DCA), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) analysis. Results: In the external test cohort, the integrated machine learning model constructed based on clinical features (CTR, smoking status, maximum diameter of the solid component), rad-score, and delta rad-score showed that the random forest model performed the best, with an AUC of 0.91. The random forest model outperformed the clinical model (AUC = 0.80), rad-score (AUC = 0.79), and delta rad-score (AUC = 0.81). DCA and IDI indicated that the random forest model provides superior clinical benefit and improvement. Conclusion: Delta radiomics significantly aids in identifying high-grade subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma. The integrated machine learning model offers an effective approach for prediction of high-grade components, with potential clinical implications. Clinical Relevance Statement: This study presents a novel application of delta radiomics to predict high-grade lung adenocarcinoma, which may influence surgical management and improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.