ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2025
Dual-metric Bayesian optimization of B-spline mesh size for 4DCT lung registration.
Article in European journal of radiology open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: We aim to optimize the patient-specific mesh size (N) in the B-spline deformable image registration method, enhancing the computational efficiency of 4DCT lung image registration. Methods: This study included 37 subjects (10 from the DIRLAB public dataset and 27 from a private 4DCT cohort), each consisting of 10 respiratory phases. A Bayesian optimization (BO) framework was proposed to determine patient-specific N within [2, 50]. Registration accuracy was evaluated using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff Distance (HD). To further validate registration robustness, extreme-phase registrations were additionally tested, and inverse consistency error (ICE) was calculated to assess deformation invertibility. A global evaluation approach was also applied across the full respiratory cycle, and the computational cost of the traditional grid search (GS) was analyzed for comparison. Results: BO efficiently determined patient-specific N, with optimal values ranging from 6 to 15 (overall mean = 10.4 ± 2.6), achieving DSC = 0.976 and HD = 0.814. In the extreme-phase tests, registration performance remained stable between forward and reverse directions, with DSC > 0.94, HD Conclusions: The proposed BO framework efficiently optimized patient-specific mesh sizes, achieving high registration accuracy and significantly reduced computation time, thereby offering a promising tool to improve efficiency in adaptive radiotherapy and motion-compensated treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.