ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025
Retrospective cohort study analyzing temporal bone cortical thickness and perioperative complication rate, in pediatric cochlear implantation.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cochlear implant fixation in pediatric patients can be challenging due to the thin cranial bone. The dura matter can be exposed by drilling a bony recess leading to possible complications. A minimally invasive newer fixation method might avoid such risks. Objectives: The study focus is to assess the feasibility of drilling a bony well adequate for cochlear implant receiver/stimulator device embedment in pediatric patients of different age groups. We also aim report the occurred complications and device failure rates using different surgical techniques for cochlear approach and fixation of the implant. Methods: Computed tomography (CT) scans of 96 pediatric patients (192 ears) were acquired. An optimal location was found within a predetermined area of the temporal bone, using an in-house designed algorithm in Materialise Python API. The feasibility of drilling a bony well was assessed by digitally removing a ramped shaped bony well. Skull thickness descriptive data were calculated, before and after the removal of the bone. Clinical data of pediatric CI patients receiving their cochlear implant between 1996 and 2021 in our tertiary center, were retrospectively collected. Results: In 153 ears (79.7%) it was not feasible to create a bony well without exposing the dura mater. In young children aged 0-4 years, drilling a bony well was not feasible in almost all patients (n=69, 98.6%). Mean minimum bone thickness of the location determined by the algorithm, in different age groups, varied from 1.84 mm in the 0-4 years, to 3.31 mm in the 15-17 years age group. We included 344 cochlear implants in 230 patients with a mean age of 3 years. Most implants were placed using the mastoidectomy with posterior tympanotomy (MPTA) approach technique (n=256, 74.4%) and fixated with the bony well fixation technique with or without bony tie-down sutures (n=293, 85.1%). Major complications occurred in all surgical techniques groups. Device related complications occurred in both the bony well and the tight pocket groups. Conclusion: Drilling a bony well for fixation of the cochlear implant without exposing the dura matter is not feaible in children. No difference in complication rates was reported regarding device failure between subgroups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.