ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025
A quality improvement initiative to improve developmental screening in a high-risk follow-up clinic in western India.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Early childhood is a uniquely sensitive period for developing cognitive ability, language, social and motor development. Any disruption in the typical progression within these areas may result in developmental delays if not intervened timely, potentially causing various morbidities in a child and adversely affecting the quality of life for both the child and their family. Therefore, it is essential to conduct developmental screenings at regular recommended intervals. Methods: This single-center quality improvement (QI) study was conducted in a tertiary care center with a level 3B neonatal intensive care unit, running a high-risk follow-up clinic. We aimed to improve the developmental screening in children (≤2 years) visiting the high-risk follow-up clinic, from the current 46.1% to ≥75% within three months. A quality improvement team conducted a root cause analysis for low screening rate, which led to the planning of several interventions. These included ensuring the consistent availability of Ages and Stages Questionnaire-3 (ASQ-3) screening forms in both regional and official languages, establishing a dedicated ASQ-3 counter, and conducting reinforcement and training sessions for interns and junior residents. Data was logged in the clinic record book and analyzed with statistical process control chart (P chart) and a run chart. Results: This QI project commenced in October 2023 and is still operational in a sustainable phase. During the study period, out of 1,368 eligible children, 1,259 (92%) underwent developmental screening using the ASQ-3 screening tool ( Conclusion: This QI project improved the clinic's ASQ-3 performance rate, thereby helping more children with developmental delay obtain early intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.