Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41244232›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroendovascular therapy2025

Cerebrovascular Pressure Restoration Rates during Recanalisation with Aspiration and Stent-Retriever Thrombectomy for Acute Ischaemic Stroke: An in Vitro Study.

Ezekiel Dinama, Gilbert Gravino, Sanjeev Nayak, Ying Yang, Christine Roffe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroendovascular therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ezekiel DinamaSchool of Pharmacy and Bioengineering, Keele University, Stoke on Trent, UK.
Gilbert GravinoSchool of Pharmacy and Bioengineering, Keele University, Stoke on Trent, UK.
Sanjeev NayakSchool of Pharmacy and Bioengineering, Keele University, Stoke on Trent, UK.
Ying YangSchool of Pharmacy and Bioengineering, Keele University, Stoke on Trent, UK.
Christine RoffeSchool of Pharmacy and Bioengineering, Keele University, Stoke on Trent, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Mechanical thrombectomy alters cerebrovascular hemodynamics in ways that remain poorly characterized. This in vitro study investigated the pressure restoration rate (PRR), a quantitative measure of how quickly pressure returns to baseline in an occluded vessel, during thrombectomy using aspiration and stent-retriever devices in different cerebrovascular anatomical configurations. Methods: A cerebrovascular glass model with pulsatile flow was constructed to simulate good (symmetrically connected) and poor (unilateral) collateral anatomy. Pressure sensors were integrated into the system to record hemodynamic responses during thrombectomy procedures using SOFIA 5F and 6F aspiration catheters (Terumo Neuro, Aliso Viejo, CA, USA) and a Solitaire 6 × 30-mm stent retriever (Medtronic, Irvine, CA, USA). PRR was calculated in the middle cerebral artery at a 5-ms resolution and compared across devices and anatomical variants using Kruskal-Wallis tests. Results: Aspiration thrombectomy exhibited significantly higher PRRs than the stent-retriever thrombectomy across both good and poor collateral models ( Conclusion: This study demonstrates that thrombectomy induces different hemodynamic flow return patterns in the targeted vessel, with technique-specific PRR values. High PRRs, particularly with aspiration, may subject compromised cerebral vessels to potentially injurious pressure surges during reperfusion. These findings suggest a possible mechanistic link between device-technique modality and complications such as hemorrhagic transformation, warranting further investigation in clinical settings.

Indexed as

devicesischemic strokemechanical thrombectomy

Identifiers

PMID41244232
PMCPMC12615144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.