Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41244229›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2025

Minimum 5-Year Outcomes, Complication Rates, and Conversion to Total Knee Arthroplasty Following Isolated Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Repair.

Jorge Chahla, Rodrigo Saad Berreta, Eric J Cotter, Juan Bernardo Villarreal-Espinosa, Stephanie Boden, Johnathon McCormick, Zeeshan A Khan, Christopher Bozer, Giovanni Rodriguez, Brian J Cole and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jorge ChahlaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Rodrigo Saad BerretaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6019-7509
Eric J CotterDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Juan Bernardo Villarreal-EspinosaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Stephanie BodenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Johnathon McCormickDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Zeeshan A KhanRush University Medical College, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Christopher BozerRush University Medical College, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Giovanni RodriguezRush University Medical College, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Brian J ColeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Adam B YankeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Nikhil N VermaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) repair is indicated in patients with preserved articular cartilage to prevent rapidly progressive osteoarthritis. However, there is limited published data on midterm outcomes after MMPRT repair. Purpose: To report the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), complication, and failure rate for patients undergoing MMPRT repair at a minimum of 5-year follow-up. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A single-institution prospectively collected database was retrospectively queried for patients who underwent isolated MMPRT repair from January 2016 to March 2019. Exclusion criteria included Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≥3 osteoarthritis, concurrent ligamentous or realignment procedures, all-inside suture anchor repair, and concomitant lateral meniscal tears. The clinical outcome measures included conversion to knee arthroplasty, the shortened Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome (KOOS) Jr, International Knee Documentation (IKDC), and Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) scores. Clinical failure was defined as failing to achieve the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for ≥1 PROM. The MCID and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) thresholds were derived from a peer-reviewed study and were as follows: IKDC (MCID, 10.2; PASS, 67.8), KOOS Jr (MCID, 10.4; PASS, 71.9) and VR-12 Physical (MCID, 6.1; PASS, 47.8). Results: A total of 38 patients who met inclusion criteria and underwent transtibial root repair before March 2019 were retrospectively identified, of which 36 (94.7%) were available for follow-up at mean 65.8 ± 6.7 months (range, 60-81). Of this total, 5 patients (13.9%) converted to arthroplasty (mean ± SD, 41.8 ± 28.0 months). Transtibial pullout repair had an overall survivorship of 97.2%, 94.4%, and 91.6% at the 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year time points, while 2 patients failed after 60 months postoperatively, for an 86.1% arthroplasty-free survivorship at mean 65.8 months. MCID and PASS achievement rates at final follow-up for KOOS Jr were 74.2% and 51.6%, respectively. Three patients (8.3%) failed to achieve MCID for any 1 of the 3 PROMs while 28 patients (77.8%) achieved the MCID for ≥1 PROM. Conclusion: Clinically significant outcomes for KOOS Jr were achieved in 74.2% and 51.6% of patients undergoing transtibial pullout repair for isolated MMPRT at 5-year follow-up. There was an 86.1% survivorship free of arthroplasty at midterm follow-up.

Indexed as

kneemeniscusroot tearTKAtotal knee arthroplastytranstibial pullout repair

Identifiers

PMID41244229
PMCPMC12612512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.