ArticlePeerJ2025
IPI score as a new prognostic index in extensive stage small cell lung cancer.
Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Prognostic Value of the SUVmax-IPI Composite Score on Overall Survival in Metastatic Prostate Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Personalized prognostic assessment in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) necessitates a comprehensive understanding of systemic inflammatory markers and their impact on survival outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of a novel Inflammatory Prognostic Index (IPI) score, derived from four inflammation-related biochemical markers-albumin, C-reactive protein (CRP), neutrophils, and lymphocytes-in patients with ES-SCLC. Methods: Patients diagnosed with ES-SCLC were eligible if adequate clinical, pathological, and follow-up data were available. The IPI score was derived using the formula: C-reactive protein × neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)/serum albumin. The threshold value for the IPI score was identified using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis within the cohort and was applied in an exploratory manner. Based on the predefined cut-off, patients were stratified into low- and high-IPI groups. The log-rank test was used to compare survival times, while Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analyses assessed variables associated with long-term survival. Overall survival (OS) served as the primary endpoint, and progression-free survival (PFS) was evaluated as a secondary endpoint. Results: Patients with a high IPI score had a mean OS of 9 months (95% CI [4.8-13.2]), while those with a low IPI score had a mean OS of 23 months (95% CI [11.4-34.6]), a statistically significant difference ( Conclusion: The IPI score in ES-SCLC patients was associated with prognosis, with a high IPI score indicating poorer OS. These findings should be considered hypothesis-generating and warrant validation in larger prospective cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.