ArticleAsian journal of transfusion science
Preoperative cross-matching in major elective surgical procedures in children: An audit of department's transfusion practices.
Article in Asian journal of transfusion science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTo determine the utilization of cross-matched packed red blood cell (PRBC) concentrate in children posted for major elective operative procedures. To evaluate the efficacy of a simple preoperative "screening criteria" for ordering preoperative cross-match. MATERIALS AND
methodsData were retrieved from online surgery scheduling system prospectively over a 4-month period (January-April 2022). The number of units cross-matched and those utilized were assessed. A screening criterion was devised in consultation with stakeholders for ordering blood. The utilization of PRBCs was reassessed after implementation of these criteria and reaudited (July-October 2022). A subset analysis of A1 (tunneled catheter placements) and A2 (core pediatric surgical procedures) groups was done to analyze blood utilization.
resultsInitial audit showed poor PRBC utilization with 46 units unused of the 54 cross-matched units, and most of these were from A1 group (3 of 29 units and 5 out of 25 units utilized in A1 and A2 groups, respectively). Reaudit after introducing cutoff criteria showed sharp decline (79.3%) in the number of cross-matched units and the number of units returned (84.6% decrease) in A1 group and the number of units returned unused dropped by 50% in the A2 group. There was visible reversal of indicators of utilization (cross-match to transfusion ratio dropped from 6.75 to 1.73 and TI increased from 0.163 to 0.613), indicating optimal utilization.
conclusionThis pilot audit clearly demonstrates the gap between requisition and utilization of cross-matched PRBCs. Formulating an effective screening criterion avoids unnecessary cross-matching and wastage of resources and maximizes utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.