Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41244090›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2025

Anatomic Biomarkers Predict Poor Presenting Visual Acuity in Infectious Keratitis.

Shruti Anant, Kamini Reddy, Jordan Shuff, Kunal S Parikh, Elesh Jain, Subeesh Kuyyadiyil, Gautam Parmar, Nakul S Shekhawat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shruti AnantWilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6906-9730
Kamini ReddyWilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jordan ShuffWilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kunal S ParikhWilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Elesh JainDepartment of Cornea and Refractive Services, Sadguru Netra Chikitsalaya Eye Hospital, Chitrakoot, MP, India.
Subeesh KuyyadiyilDepartment of Cornea and Refractive Services, Sadguru Netra Chikitsalaya Eye Hospital, Chitrakoot, MP, India.
Gautam ParmarDepartment of Cornea and Refractive Services, Sadguru Netra Chikitsalaya Eye Hospital, Chitrakoot, MP, India.
Nakul S ShekhawatWilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

Improving Outcomes Assessment for Microbial KeratitisK23EY032988 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Nakul Shekhawat · 2022 to 2026
$1.1M
NEI NIH HHS K23 EY032988
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Infectious keratitis, the leading cause of corneal blindness, disproportionately affects developing countries. We examined risk factors for poor presenting visual acuity in a rural Indian population. Patients and Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of patients ≥16 years old with active infectious keratitis at SNC Hospital, a tertiary eye hospital in north India, from June to November 2024. Variables collected were demographics, clinical features, and anatomic findings on slit-lamp examination. Binomial logistic regression measured association of variables with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≤20/200. Significant univariable associations were incorporated into a multivariable model. Results: Among 667 patients with keratitis (mean age: 50.3 ± 15 years), 497 (74.5%) presented with VA ≤20/200. Independent risk factors for poor VA included older age (prevalence ratio [PR] 1.01/year, 95% CI 1.00-1.01, p<0.001), bacterial infection (PR 1.12, 95% CI 1.03-1.23, p=0.009), polymicrobial infections (PR 1.13, 95% CI 1.01-1.26, p=0.027), larger epithelial defect (PR 1.38, 95% CI 1.12-1.71, p=0.042 with epithelial defect diameter >6mm), posterior stromal infiltrate (PR 1.22, 95% CI 1.09-1.36, p<0.001), endothelial plaque (PR 1.13, 95% CI 1.00-1.26, p=0.043), central infiltrate location (PR 1.26, 95% CI 1.14-1.38, p<0.001) and hypopyon (PR 1.28, 95% CI 1.18-1.39, p<0.001). Travel distance, time to presentation, and clinical risk factors were not independently associated with poor VA. Conclusion: Anatomic features including larger epithelial defects, deep stromal infiltrates, endothelial plaque, central location, and hypopyon were the strongest predictors of poor VA. These findings highlight the utility of anatomic features for identifying eyes at risk for severe outcomes and serving as biomarkers in future clinical trials.

Indexed as

biomarkerscorneal infectioncorneal ulcerrisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID41244090
PMCPMC12619621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.