Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41244064›Full record

ArticleNeurophotonics2026

How to design real-world functional near-infrared spectroscopy studies: a primer.

Isla L Jones, Chiara Bulgarelli, Sara De Felice, Paola Pinti, Antonia F de C Hamilton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurophotonics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Isla L JonesUniversity College London, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5410-4417
Chiara BulgarelliBirkbeck, University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6153-137X
Sara De FeliceUniversity of Cambridge, Department of Psychology, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3065-3363
Paola PintiBirkbeck, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Antonia F de C HamiltonUniversity College London, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8000-0219

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significance: Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is a unique neuroimaging methodology with high portability and tolerance of motion, making it well-suited to research in dynamic real-world environments. However, it is crucial to carefully design fNIRS paradigms to suit the unique requirements of real-world research settings. We outline key design principles and considerations for fNIRS studies. Aim: In this paper, we address the lack of guidance on experimental design for fNIRS, which in our growing field can help to educate new fNIRS researchers and improve the quality and applicability of fNIRS research across various settings. Approach: Here, we provide a primer for how to design fNIRS studies and overcome challenges in fNIRS experimental design, with a focus on naturalistic real-world research, which has gathered increased research interest in recent years. Conclusions: We conclude by outlining seven key design principles researchers can use to guide experimental design for fNIRS research.

Indexed as

designdevelopmentalexperimentfNIRSfunctional near-infrared spectroscopyhyperscanningnaturalisticsocial

Identifiers

PMID41244064
PMCPMC12618016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.