ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Does Size Matter? Exploring the Impact of Acellular Dermal Matrix Dimensions on Complications in Immediate Breast Reconstruction.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Breast Implants: Biomaterials, Surfaces, Biocompatibility-A Biomedical Engineering Perspective.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Recent years have seen an increase in prepectoral immediate implant-based reconstructions, requiring larger acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) for implant coverage. Previous studies have suggested a potential rise in infection, flap necrosis, and seroma rates with ADM use in breast reconstructions. However, to our knowledge, no data exist to determine whether these complications are due to the presence of ADM itself or its size. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between ADM size and the incidence of postoperative complications. Methods: A retrospective, single-center analysis was conducted on 229 women (297 breasts) undergoing immediate breast reconstruction with ADM. Reconstructions were stratified into 2 cohorts: small ADM (≤128 cm², n = 91) and large ADM (>128 cm², n = 206). Demographic, comorbidity, surgical, and outcome data were collected and analyzed. Seroma incidence was assessed by time to drain removal. Results: There was no significant difference in the time to drain removal between cohorts (mean = 13.34 versus 14.09 d). Logistic regression showed a nonsignificant trend toward an increased infection rate in the large ADM cohort (odds ratio = 5.40, Conclusions: Seroma and infection were not significantly influenced by ADM size. These findings suggest that the previously observed increase in these postoperative complications is due to the presence of ADM, rather than its size, supporting the continued efficacy and safety of ADM in prepectoral breast reconstructions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.