ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Understanding Risk in Emergent Reconstructive Flap Surgery.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Flap-based reconstruction is critical for soft tissue defect coverage, but risks in emergency cases are poorly defined. This study compared postoperative outcomes of emergency versus elective myocutaneous and fasciocutaneous flap reconstructions. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of adults undergoing flap reconstruction from 2012 to 2023 in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patients were categorized as emergency or elective. Primary outcomes included 30-day mortality, major complications, surgical site infections, and overall complications. Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, nutritional status, and physiological markers. Results: Among 12,263 patients, 1570 (12.8%) had emergency reconstructions. Emergency patients more often presented with sepsis, anemia, functional dependence, and American Society of Anesthesiologists class III-V. Unadjusted analysis showed that emergency status was associated with higher rates of mortality (odds ratio [OR] 4.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.01-7.55, Conclusions: Emergency flap reconstruction is independently linked to higher short-term mortality and major complications compared with elective cases, even after accounting for comorbidities and physiological status. These findings underscore the need for careful perioperative planning, triage, and risk mitigation strategies in urgent settings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.