ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Health System Factors Influencing Availability and Access to Comprehensive Care for Cleft Lip, Palate, and Craniofacial Anomalies in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cleft lip and palate are common craniofacial anomalies. In low- and middle-income countries, patients with these conditions face barriers to comprehensive care. In Tanzania, despite some hospitals performing surgical procedures, the health system factors affecting access to full cleft care remain unclear. This study aimed to assess the health system factors influencing the availability and access to comprehensive care for cleft lip, palate, and associated craniofacial anomalies in Tanzania. Methods: A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted across 37 health facilities selected based on their capacity to provide cleft care services. Facility readiness, availability of specialized personnel, infrastructure, and financing were assessed through structured questionnaires administered to health facility managers. Data were analyzed descriptively, and cross-tabulations were performed to determine predictors of cleft care availability and accessibility. Results: Among the 37 facilities surveyed, 89.7% (33 of 37) could diagnose cleft lip and palate; however, only 24% (9 of 37) provided comprehensive management. There was a severe shortage of specialized personnel required for comprehensive cleft care. Plastic surgeons were available in only 3 out of 37 (8.1%) hospitals surveyed. Speech therapists were available in only 2 facilities (5.4%), and only 1 public hospital offered speech therapy services. Limited financial resources and inadequate equipment were major barriers to providing comprehensive care. Conclusions: Although many Tanzanian health facilities can diagnose cleft lip and palate, few provide comprehensive care. Addressing these gaps requires targeted government funding, expanded local surgeon training programs, improved retention strategies, structured referral pathways, and investment in a multidisciplinary approach for cleft care services.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.