ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2025
Impact of Cryopreservation Extenders on Epigenetic Changes in Bull Sperm: H19 and MEG3 Methylation.
Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of Cryopreservation Extenders on Epigenetic Changes in Bull Sperm: H19 and MEG3 Methylation.Veterinary medicine and science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cryopreservation of sperm is critical for livestock genetic improvement, yet its impact on epigenetic stability, especially the methylation of imprinted genes, remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the effects of soy lecithin (SLE) and egg yolk (EYE) extenders on sperm quality and the DNA methylation of the imprinted genes H19 and MEG3 following the cryopreservation process. We evaluated sperm motility parameters, membrane integrity and morphology using six Holstein-Friesian bull sperm samples. Total motility (TM) showed significant reductions after cryopreservation, decreasing from 91.6% ± 1.52% in fresh sperm to 79.9% ± 1.52% in the SLE group and 77.3% ± 1.52% in the EYE group post-thaw (p ≤ 0.05). Similarly, progressive motility (PM) decreased from 64.4% ± 1.8% in fresh sperm to 44.9% ± 1.8% in the (SLE) group and 39.6% ± 1.8% in the (EYE) group. Freezing and post-thawing processes resulted in significant reductions (p ≤ 0.05) in other motility parameters, including linearity (LIN), curvilinear velocity (VCL), straight-line velocity (VSL) and average path velocity (VAP). Following the freezing-thawing process, the SLE group exhibited a smaller reduction in PM and LIN compared to the EYE group. Notably, the SLE extender demonstrated a protective role in membrane integrity compared to the EYE extender (p ≤ 0.05). However, bisulphite sequencing revealed no significant differences in the methylation levels of H19 and MEG3 genes or in sperm morphology between the two extenders (p ≥ 0.05). This study highlights the importance of selecting appropriate extenders in cryopreservation protocols and their implications for future research on sperm quality and fertility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.