Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41243845›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2026

Fetal size, gestational age, and cognitive performance at 5 years in term-born children: Four national cohorts' study.

Xuan Zhao, Robert Eves, Siobhan Quenby, Sakari Lemola, Dieter Wolke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Fetal size, gestational age, and cognitive performance at 5 years in term-born children: Four national cohorts' study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xuan ZhaoDepartment of Psychology, Lifespan Health and Wellbeing Group, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1664-2078
Robert EvesDepartment of Psychology, Lifespan Health and Wellbeing Group, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0476-1811
Siobhan QuenbyWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3221-5471
Sakari LemolaFakultät für Psychologie und Sportwissenschaft, Universität Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1314-6194
Dieter WolkeDepartment of Psychology, Lifespan Health and Wellbeing Group, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0304-268X

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 462-16-040UK Research and Innovation EP/X023206/1University of Warwick BB2UP
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFetal size and gestational age are essential factors to consider when determining the timing of delivery between mothers and obstetricians in term pregnancies. Previous studies have shown that both fetal size and gestational age have associations with cognitive or academic outcomes. This study aimed to determine whether the association between gestational age (37-41 weeks) and child intelligence is moderated by fetal size in term-born children.

methodsData were harmonized for four national cohorts in the USA, UK, Ireland, and Australia. Predictors included fetal size and gestational age. Fetal size was calculated using Fenton's chart and grouped into three categories: Large for gestational age (LGA) (>90th percentile), appropriate for gestational age (AGA) (10th to 90th percentile), and small for gestational age (SGA) (<10th percentile). The outcome was intelligence quotient (IQ) scores at age 5 years. Linear models, contrast analyses, and point plots were employed.

resultsIn total, 30 035 term-born participants were included in the analysis. Overall, being born before 41 weeks and being born with SGA (but not LGA) were both negatively associated with IQ. No statistically significant interactions between fetal size category and gestational age at term were found. At each gestation from 37 to 41 weeks, being born SGA (but not LGA) was associated with lower IQ when compared to AGA. A small but clinically significant reduction in IQ (i.e., 0.23 IQ Z-score, equivalent to a 3.45 IQ difference) was found in SGA-born children who were born at 37 weeks compared to 41 weeks.

conclusionThe association between gestation and child IQ at age 5 was not moderated by fetal size in term-born children. Regardless of gestational age at term, SGA (but not LGA) is consistently and unfavorably associated with poorer cognitive outcomes. The IQ at age 5 was only clinically meaningfully decreased in SGA children born at 37 weeks.

Indexed as

CognitionGestational AgeIntelligenceAdultAustraliaBirth WeightChild DevelopmentChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesFemaleFetal DevelopmentHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, Small for Gestational AgeIntelligence TestsIrelandappropriate for gestational agecognitive outcomesearly‐termfetal sizegestational ageintelligence quotientlarge for gestational agesmall for gestational agetiming of delivery

Identifiers

PMID41243845
PMCPMC13094675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.