Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41243796›Full record

ArticlePrimary health care research & development2025

Optimizing people's movement across the health system: a scoping review of referral systems within a primary health care approach.

Mary Louisa Plummer, Emilie Calvello Hynes, John Fogarty, Nuria Toro Polanco, Teri Reynolds

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Primary health care research & development, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mary Louisa PlummerClinical Services and Systems Unit, Department of Integrated Health Services, https://ror.org/01f80g185World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6816-8235
Emilie Calvello HynesClinical Services and Systems Unit, Department of Integrated Health Services, https://ror.org/01f80g185World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4777-9520
John FogartyClinical Services and Systems Unit, Department of Integrated Health Services, https://ror.org/01f80g185World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7964-1729
Nuria Toro PolancoClinical Services and Systems Unit, Department of Integrated Health Services, https://ror.org/01f80g185World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Teri ReynoldsClinical Services and Systems Unit, Department of Integrated Health Services, https://ror.org/01f80g185World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7103-9488

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional referral systems are critical to primary health care and universal health coverage. Referral and counter-referral are key relational mechanisms to link communities to the care they need and primary care to secondary and multi-sectoral services. Many referral systems are fragmented, leading to inefficiencies, coverage gaps, and compromised continuity and quality of care. In June 2024, we conducted a scoping review of PubMed, Global Index Medicus and WHO publication databases to identify referral coordination and process initiatives at national, subnational, and local levels.We classified reports from 181 papers into non-exclusive categories based on referral system design, operational elements, service delivery platform, and/or user group. Initiatives targeting referral system design included modelling, organization and assessment methodologies. Initiatives focusing on operational elements included networks and linkages, pathways and algorithms, e-referral systems and platforms, digital processes and tools, and facility-level processes and tools.When classified by service delivery platform, community-level initiatives emphasized improved recognition, screening, diagnosis, and communication by community health workers and use of SMS text messaging or mHealth apps. At initiating facilities, reports focused on standardizing referral criteria and protocols and optimizing communication with referral facilities, including for real-time clinical decision-making to improve timely referral and to reduce under- and over-referral. Structured algorithms and pathways were key to minimize the time between referral, diagnosis, and treatment for time-sensitive conditions. At receiving facilities, actions included supporting initiating facility clinical decision-making prior to referral, prioritizing urgent cases, and consistent counter-referral and/or onward referral.Findings are informing WHO guidance on two-way referral systems.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareReferral and ConsultationHumanscare coordinationcare pathwayhealth systempatient journeypatient navigationreferral

Identifiers

PMID41243796
PMCPMC12646189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.