ReviewAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025
Electrolyte Engineering toward Rational Electrode-Electrolyte Interfacial Designs for Metal Batteries.
Review in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Electrolyte Engineering toward Rational Electrode-Electrolyte Interfacial Designs for Metal Batteries.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lithium, zinc, sodium, potassium, and magnesium metal batteries have emerged as the core direction of next-generation energy storage technologies due to their ultrahigh theoretical capacities. However, the uncontrollable dendrite growth and unstable solid electrolyte interface of metal anodes during cycling lead to battery short-circuiting, capacity fading, and safety hazards, severely hindering their commercialization process. Further design of excellent electrode-electrolyte interfaces requires precisely identifying and addressing related scientific challenges from multiple dimensions. Specifically, this review focuses on the evolution of the solid electrolyte interphase with philic-phobic properties on the surface of metal electrodes and discusses key influencing factors governing its evolution, including electrolyte additives and artificial solid electerolyte interphase. The research progress in solid electrolyte interface with philic-phobic properties regulation using electrolyte additives and other methods in recent years is systematically summarized. Additionally, the influence mechanisms of electrode-electrolyte interface design on battery performance under extreme environments for lithium metal batteries and novel metal batteries are emphatically discussed. Future research needs to deeply explore the micro-mechanisms and develop more efficient materials and technologies to further improve battery performance and meet the growing demands of the energy storage field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.