ArticleAnnals of medicine2025
Machine learning-based preliminary screening tool for clinical pregnancy prediction: towards management of IVF/ICSI stages.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning-enabled prediction of ART pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
- Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Assisted Reproductive Technology: Bridging Prediction and Clinical Judgment.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting in-hospital hypoglycemia in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a multicenter retrospective study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Development and external validation of a three-stage model to predict live birth after fresh IVF/ICSI embryo transfer.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a machine learning-based diagnostic model for obstructive coronary artery disease in hypertensive patients using composite inflammatory and lipid markers.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based prediction of IVF/ICSI outcomes in male factor infertility highlighting couple-level BMI.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate prediction of pregnancy outcomes in assisted reproductive technology (ART) remains a clinical challenge due to the complexity and heterogeneity of IVF/ICSI cycles. Existing models often focus on isolated treatment stages and rely on linear statistical assumptions, limiting their ability to support personalized care throughout the entire treatment process.
methodsThis retrospective study included 1,062 women who underwent IVF/ICSI between 2016 and 2021, with an additional temporal validation cohort of 250 patients treated in 2022. Two machine learning (ML) models were developed to predict clinical pregnancy outcomes during the pre-treatment and treatment phases. Model performance was evaluated using metrics including precision-recall curves, F1 score, calibration, Brier score, and decision curve analysis. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used to enhance interpretability, and restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis explored nonlinear relationships. Both models were deployed as interactive web calculators to facilitate clinical use.
resultsBoth models demonstrated favorable performance in internal and external validation. Key predictors identified for the pre-treatment phase included female age, antral follicle count (AFC), and body mass index (BMI). For the treatment phase, important predictors comprised serum progesterone level on HCG day, gonadotropin dosage, and endometrial thickness on HCG day. RCS and subgroup analyses revealed significant nonlinear threshold effects of these variables on pregnancy probability.
conclusionWe developed and validated dual-phase ML models for clinical pregnancy prediction across IVF/ICSI stages. Through improved interpretability and online accessibility, our models offer a practical and individualized decision-support tool to optimize ART strategies in real-world clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.