Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41243616›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine2025

Machine learning-based preliminary screening tool for clinical pregnancy prediction: towards management of IVF/ICSI stages.

Shaomin Huang, Kunduzi Tuerganbayi, Jiawen Wang, Salama Habibu Saad, Jingjing Zhang, Jianjun Zou, Xiaohong Yan, Kaizong Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shaomin HuangDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.ORCID 0009-0004-5641-5050
Kunduzi TuerganbayiDepartment of Pharmacy, Nanjing First Hospital, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0009-0005-8574-2234
Jiawen WangJiangsu Key Laboratory for High Technology Research of TCM Formulae, National and Local Collaborative Engineering Center of Chinese Medicinal Resources Industrialization and Formulae Innovative Medicine and Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Chinese Medicinal Resources Industrialization, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.ORCID 0009-0004-7108-1546
Salama Habibu SaadDepartment of Pharmacy, Nanjing First Hospital, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0009-0002-6088-4795
Jingjing ZhangDepartment of Pharmacy, Nanjing First Hospital, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5122-0909
Jianjun ZouDepartment of Pharmacy, Nanjing First Hospital, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0886-3153
Xiaohong YanDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.ORCID 0009-0001-4559-9059
Kaizong HuangDepartment of Pharmacy, Nanjing First Hospital, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4926-6980

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate prediction of pregnancy outcomes in assisted reproductive technology (ART) remains a clinical challenge due to the complexity and heterogeneity of IVF/ICSI cycles. Existing models often focus on isolated treatment stages and rely on linear statistical assumptions, limiting their ability to support personalized care throughout the entire treatment process.

methodsThis retrospective study included 1,062 women who underwent IVF/ICSI between 2016 and 2021, with an additional temporal validation cohort of 250 patients treated in 2022. Two machine learning (ML) models were developed to predict clinical pregnancy outcomes during the pre-treatment and treatment phases. Model performance was evaluated using metrics including precision-recall curves, F1 score, calibration, Brier score, and decision curve analysis. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used to enhance interpretability, and restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis explored nonlinear relationships. Both models were deployed as interactive web calculators to facilitate clinical use.

resultsBoth models demonstrated favorable performance in internal and external validation. Key predictors identified for the pre-treatment phase included female age, antral follicle count (AFC), and body mass index (BMI). For the treatment phase, important predictors comprised serum progesterone level on HCG day, gonadotropin dosage, and endometrial thickness on HCG day. RCS and subgroup analyses revealed significant nonlinear threshold effects of these variables on pregnancy probability.

conclusionWe developed and validated dual-phase ML models for clinical pregnancy prediction across IVF/ICSI stages. Through improved interpretability and online accessibility, our models offer a practical and individualized decision-support tool to optimize ART strategies in real-world clinical settings.

Indexed as

Fertilization in VitroMachine LearningSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicAdultFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy OutcomePregnancy RateProgesteroneRetrospective StudiesProgesteroneassisted reproductive technologyembryo transfermachine learningPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID41243616
PMCPMC12624961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.