ArticleInorganic chemistry2025
Stabilization Effects in Phosphinyl Radicals: The Scope of the Donor, Acceptor, and Captodative Functionalization.
Article in Inorganic chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accessing stable phosphinyl radicals continues to pose a major synthetic challenge. To aid the effective design of such radicals and to understand their behaviors, this computational study systematically explores the possibilities and limitations of electronic and steric effects governing the stability of phosphinyl radicals, with a particular focus on captodative substitutions. To decipher the delocalization effects, the electronic structures of various radicals have been scrutinized by their spin distributions and using natural bonding orbital analyses. The best stabilization effects are primarily offered by π-donor groups; however, the most efficient π-donors are exceptions and suffer from a saturation effect. To compensate for this disadvantageous phenomenon, various captodative substitutions have been assessed, and several examples were found to benefit from extra stabilization. As electronic effects alone are insufficient to prevent the dimerization, additional protection arising from sterically encumbered substituents is also necessary, and steric effects were found to prevail over electronic effects in stabilizing the monomeric radical. Among the studied substituents, spherical groups placed at the donor and acceptor sites provide better steric protection than planar groups. Embedding the N-centers into cyclic frameworks further enhances stability. Integrating the results of our systematic investigations, we propose several potential candidates for synthetic purposes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.