Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41243605›Full record

ArticleActa ophthalmologica2026

Long-term outcomes of nationwide coordinated neovascular AMD treatment: A study based on Polish national registry.

Sławomir Teper, Daniel Ledwoń, Adam Sendecki, Patrycja Romaniszyn-Kania, Aleksandra Tuszy, Julia Nycz, Andrzej W Mitas, Małgorzata Figurska, Edward Wylęgała, Marek Rękas

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta ophthalmologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sławomir TeperChair and Clinical Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0935-8880
Daniel LedwońFaculty of Biomedical Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Zabrze, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7704-2901
Adam SendeckiChair and Clinical Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7605-8653
Patrycja Romaniszyn-KaniaFaculty of Biomedical Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Zabrze, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1689-4347
Aleksandra TuszyFaculty of Biomedical Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Zabrze, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1334-0236
Julia NyczInstitute of Biomedical Engineering and Informatics, Technische Universität Ilmenau, Ilmenau, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6031-1423
Andrzej W MitasFaculty of Biomedical Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Zabrze, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7833-5845
Małgorzata FigurskaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Military Institute of Medicine, Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of National Defense, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6366-802X
Edward WylęgałaChair and Clinical Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6707-5790
Marek RękasDepartment of Ophthalmology, Military Institute of Medicine, Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of National Defense, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0429-6649

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate long-term outcomes of anti-VEGF therapy for nAMD using the Polish Retinal Therapeutic Program Monitoring Registry.

methodsThe cohort consisted of 63 840 eyes with nAMD qualified for treatment from 2016 to 2022, with follow-up through 31 October 2023. Long-term follow-up (>5 years) was conducted for 7631 eyes. Statistical comparisons and multivariate logistic regression analysed differences between treatment failure and long-term treatment, treatment effectiveness, drug efficacy and predictive factors.

resultsThe relative risk of nAMD in females was 1.45. By the last follow-up, 17 518 (48.6%) patients discontinued treatment due to patient-related factors, 7202 (20.0%) due to treatment failure, 6285 (17.4%) for other reasons and 5065 (14.0%) due to death or clinical complications. Long-term patients were significantly younger, more of them were previously treated, received fewer injections per year and had better baseline BCVA and lower CRT than the failure group. Females and previously treated patients had a higher likelihood of long-term therapy, while older age and initial ranibizumab treatment increased the risk of failure. Patients with an initial BCVA >0.4 logMAR had significantly worse BCVA outcomes, while CRT and treatment strategy showed no significant differences. Introduction of programme exclusion if treatment gap >4 months reduced long breaks, increased injection numbers, slightly lowered BCVA and had no significant effect on CRT.

conclusionEarly visual acuity response, drug choice (aflibercept), and healthcare system modifications influence long-term success and adherence in nAMD management. While systemic changes improved continuity and injection frequency, they did not enhance visual outcomes, highlighting the need for individualized treatment strategies.

Indexed as

RanibizumabRegistriesVisual AcuityWet Macular DegenerationAgedAged, 80 and overAngiogenesis InhibitorsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntravitreal InjectionsMaleMiddle AgedPolandReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRecombinant Fusion ProteinsafliberceptAngiogenesis InhibitorsRanibizumabReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRecombinant Fusion ProteinsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Aanti‐VEGF therapylong‐term outcomesnational registryneovascular AMDreal‐world evidence

Identifiers

PMID41243605
PMCPMC13166387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.