ArticleEarly intervention in psychiatry2025
Barriers and Opportunities for Collaboration With Primary Care: Perspectives of Early Psychosis Intervention Programs in Ontario, Canada.
Article in Early intervention in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Barriers and Opportunities for Collaboration With Primary Care: Perspectives of Early Psychosis Intervention Programs in Ontario, Canada.Early intervention in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCollaboration between early psychosis intervention (EPI) services and primary care is crucial for continuity of care for first-episode psychosis. The aim of this study was to describe the perceptions of staff at EPI programs on barriers and opportunities for collaboration with primary care.
methodsWe conducted a qualitative descriptive study using focus groups with staff at six EPI programs across Ontario, Canada (2 rural, 4 urban) with 2-9 participants per focus group (total n = 39). Focus group sessions were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. We used thematic analyses to code the transcripts and identify emergent themes.
resultsParticipants highlighted three points in the EPI treatment process where collaboration with primary care is important: during the referral/intake process, shared care throughout treatment, and at discharge from the EPI program. We identified four themes relating to broader structural issues impacting collaboration with primary care through the treatment process: client access to primary care, family physician knowledge of early psychosis, siloed communication structures, and time constraints for both EPI staff and family physicians.
conclusionsImproving primary care access in young people, increasing family physician knowledge of psychosis and EPI services, and allowing dedicated time for communication for both family physicians and EPI clinicians may improve collaboration and patient care through the processes of intake, ongoing care, and discharge from EPI services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.