Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41243554›Full record

ArticleEarly intervention in psychiatry2025

Barriers and Opportunities for Collaboration With Primary Care: Perspectives of Early Psychosis Intervention Programs in Ontario, Canada.

Rebecca Rodrigues, Jordan Edwards, Candice Madakadze, Richard Booth, Suzanne Archie, Arlene G MacDougall, Lena Palaniyappan, Chiachen Cheng, Sarah Chan, Kerri Nagy and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Early intervention in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Rebecca RodriguesDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada.
Jordan EdwardsOfford Centre for Child Studies, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Candice MadakadzeDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada.
Richard BoothArthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, Western University, London, Canada.
Suzanne ArchieDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1345-0468
Arlene G MacDougallDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada.
Lena PalaniyappanDepartment of Psychiatry, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada.
Chiachen ChengNorthern Ontario School of Medicine University, Thunder Bay, Canada.
Sarah ChanDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Kerri NagyNiagara Region Public Health, Thorold, Canada.
Kelly K AndersonDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9843-404X
project co‐investigators

Funding

Canadian Mental Health AssociationCIHR PJT 153022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCollaboration between early psychosis intervention (EPI) services and primary care is crucial for continuity of care for first-episode psychosis. The aim of this study was to describe the perceptions of staff at EPI programs on barriers and opportunities for collaboration with primary care.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative descriptive study using focus groups with staff at six EPI programs across Ontario, Canada (2 rural, 4 urban) with 2-9 participants per focus group (total n = 39). Focus group sessions were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. We used thematic analyses to code the transcripts and identify emergent themes.

resultsParticipants highlighted three points in the EPI treatment process where collaboration with primary care is important: during the referral/intake process, shared care throughout treatment, and at discharge from the EPI program. We identified four themes relating to broader structural issues impacting collaboration with primary care through the treatment process: client access to primary care, family physician knowledge of early psychosis, siloed communication structures, and time constraints for both EPI staff and family physicians.

conclusionsImproving primary care access in young people, increasing family physician knowledge of psychosis and EPI services, and allowing dedicated time for communication for both family physicians and EPI clinicians may improve collaboration and patient care through the processes of intake, ongoing care, and discharge from EPI services.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCooperative BehaviorEarly Medical InterventionPrimary Health CarePsychotic DisordersAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleOntarioQualitative Researchbarriersearly psychosis interventionfirst‐episode psychosisopportunitiesprimary carequalitative

Identifiers

PMID41243554
PMCPMC12620924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.