ArticlePathologica2025
SPOP and MMR/MSI alterations in prostate cancer: relationship with PD-L1, TILs and AR expression.
Article in Pathologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association Between Biopsy PD-L1 Combined Positive Score and Pathological Upgrading at Radical Prostatectomy in Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- PD-L1 Expression in Prostate Cancer: Anatomopathological Features, Methodological Pitfalls, and Therapeutic Potential.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Identification and validation of prognostic genes associated with clear cell renal cell carcinoma: based on public whole transcriptome sequencing datasets.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Despite the promising introduction of anti-PD-L1 therapy for advanced stage of prostate cancer (PCa), recent studies have demonstrated limited success, suggesting the need to improve patient selection. Methods: We retrospectively selected 153 PCa patients. We performed SPOP mutational analysis and evaluated PD-L1 expression, MMR/MSI status, TIL (as CD4/CD8 ratio), and the mRNA expression of AR and CD274. Using SPOP interfering-RNA in two PCa cell lines (LNCaP, PC3) and western-blot analysis, we examined the role of SPOP silencing on CD274 expression. Results: Functionally altered SPOP mutations (14 out of 153 samples, 9.15%) and MMR/MSI status (3.3%) were associated with higher PD-L1 expression (both p < 0.0001), lower TIL (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0004), and higher Gleason scores (both p < 0.05). SPOP-mutated patients exhibited significantly higher CD274, and AR mRNA expression compared to those without mutations (p = 0.0006 and p = 0.0148). Reducing SPOP expression in cancer cell lines resulted in a significant upregulation of PD-L1 expression. Conclusions: Our analysis identifies SPOP mutations and MMR/MSI status as cofactors in high PD-L1 expression and CD8/TIL presence in PCa, representing potential markers for selecting patients who are more likely to respond immunotherapy or to combined treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.