ArticlePathologica2025
Trends in Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology - Results from the Italian Cytopathology Committee National Practice Survey.
Article in Pathologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cytopathology Terminology Systems: European Federation of Cytological Societies Survey on Practice in Europe.Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
44 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To understand the state of the art of Italian thyroid cytopathology practice, a survey was sent by the Italian Committee of cytopathology to the 846 registered emails of the Italian society of pathology and cytology (SIAPEC) members. Methods: A survey divided in 4 sections (geographic distribution, pre-analytics, diagnostic work up, molecular testing) was sent to SIAPEC members in April 2023. An additional set of questions regarding molecular analysis was sent to first round participants. Results: A total of 104/846 (12.2%) SIAPEC members replied to the survey. Non-pathologist physicians performed FNA in the majority of cases (78/104, 75%). The Italian Consensus for the Classification and Reporting of Thyroid Cytology (ICCRTC) system is adopted by most centers (94/104 90,38%), although in 32.6% it was used along with other classifications systems. Only 44/104 (42.2%) of the participants performed molecular tests on thyroid FNA, mostly upon requests from the caring physician (25/41, 61.1%). Conclusion: This survey offers a snapshot of the current Italian thyroid FNA practice. The volume of thyroid FNA performed is similar to the pre-Covid workload and the ICCRTC is the most frequently adopted classification system. Molecular tests are performed by a significant minority of participants, with different testing modalities and clinical-pathological indications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.