Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41243420›Full record

ArticleZoonoses and public health2026

Flattening Patterns of Antimicrobial Resistance Levels in Indicator E. coli in Dutch Livestock.

Anita Dame-Korevaar, Erik Kuiper, Jose L Gonzales, Kees Veldman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zoonoses and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anita Dame-KorevaarWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8650-7659
Erik KuiperWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, the Netherlands.
Jose L GonzalesWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7889-5380
Kees VeldmanWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, the Netherlands.

Funding

Dutch Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, Food Security and Nature KB-37-003-054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAntimicrobial resistance (AMR) is defined by the World Health Organization as one of the most important health threats, that needs a One Health approach. Monitoring AMR in livestock is an important element, which has been done in the Netherlands in a monitoring program since 1998. The aim was to analyse AMR trends during the periods 2010-2018 and 2019-2023.

methodsA dataset containing the antimicrobial resistance data of > 12,000 indicator E. coli isolates collected from faecal samples from broilers, fattening pigs and veal calves at slaughter houses, as part of the Dutch AMR monitoring program, was built to analyze AMR trends. ECOFF values were used to distinguish wild-type (WT) and non-wild-type (non-WT, phenotypically resistant) isolates.

resultsIn the period 2010-2018 decreasing resistance patterns to most antibiotics were seen in broilers, fattening pigs and veal calves. However, in the period 2019-2023 flattening resistance patterns were observed in broilers and fattening pigs for antibiotics amoxicillin/ampicillin, sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim, at relatively high levels of resistance, despite a reduction in antibiotic usage during this period.

conclusionsFollowing a significant decreasing trend in the prevalence of AMR between 2010 and 2018, no significant changes in the prevalence of AMR were observed between 2019 and 2023 for most antibiotics. To get more insight into the limited correlation between usage and resistance in recent years, further studies are needed to analyse the relation, and underlying factors, between antibiotic usage and AMR more in depth.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, BacterialEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsLivestockAnimalsCattleChickensFecesNetherlandsSwineAnti-Bacterial Agentsantimicrobial resistanceantimicrobial usagelivestocktrend analysis

Identifiers

PMID41243420
PMCPMC12765964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.