ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2026
Treatment of isolated injuries of the posterior cruciate ligament-A 2025 Delphi-based structured expert statement by the ligament injury committee of the German Knee Society.
Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- ACL rehabilitation after reconstruction: Evidence-based consensus recommendations from the German Knee Society-Part IV.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Treatment of isolated injuries of the posterior cruciate ligament-A 2025 Delphi-based structured expert statement by the ligament injury committee of the German Knee Society.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe main goal was to perform a modified Delphi process with the Ligament Injuries Committee of the German Knee Society (DKG) to structure and optimize the management of isolated posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries.
methodsA structured modified Delphi approach was used to develop an expert statement. Steering group formulated an initial questionnaire and distributed it to 15 experienced knee surgeons (male/female 13/2, mean age 45 ± 5 years) of the working group in Round 1. Thirty-one statements covering five thematic topics were then derived from the responses and comprehensive literature search (Medline, Scopus and Cochrane) using variations of different search terms (literature group). The statements underwent two rating cycles by the working group, using a 5-point Likert scale in Round 2 and as a binary 'agree/disagree' in the final third round. Levels of evidence were assigned to each statement using standardized A-E and GRADE grading systems based on the available data.
resultsHigh agreement (≥80%) was achieved for 24 of the 31 statements (range, 83%-100%), whereas for 7 agreement was <80% (range 63%-74%). The highest levels of agreement were reached for imaging modalities, treatment of PCL tibial avulsions, and preservation of native PCL fibres in reconstruction techniques, whereas the greatest divergence was observed regarding the role of leg axis and slope analyses and indications for corrective osteotomies, use of augmentation in reconstruction and post-operative rehabilitation protocols. The available level of evidence across studies in the literature was predominantly low to moderate. Of the 31 statements, 17 were graded as expert opinion (E, GRADE: very low), 12 as case series (C; GRADE: low), and only 2 achieved higher levels of evidence (B2, GRADE: moderate).
conclusionBy providing structured treatment protocols, this Delphi-based structured expert statement can support clinicians in day-to-day decision-making and ultimately improve patient care and outcomes. STUDY
designExpert survey. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.