ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025
Machine Learning for Green Solvents: Assessment, Selection and Substitution.
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Strict environmental regulations have intensified the demand for green solvents that can replace hazardous ones without compromising performance. Existing methods for estimating solvent sustainability rely on Solvent Selection Guides (SSGs), which assign scores based on environmental, health, safety, and waste (EHSW) criteria, covering as few as 200 solvents. Expanding these guides is tedious, as it requires over 30 properties per solvent, many of which are often unavailable. Moreover, identifying greener alternatives within the limited SSG pool is challenging due to the need to balance conflicting criteria such as sustainability, cost, and performance. To address these limitations, a data-driven pipeline is presented for assessing the sustainability of solvents and identifying greener substitutes. Three models are trained and evaluated on the GlaxoSmithKline Solvent Sustainability Guide (GSK SSG) to predict "greenness" metrics: a traditional Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) model, a fine-tuned GPT model (FT GPT), and a GPT model using in-context learning (ICL). It is found that GPR slightly outperforms language-based GPT models and is used to evaluate 10,189 solvents, forming GreenSolventDB-the largest public database of green solvent metrics. These predictions are combined with Hansen solubility parameter-based metrics to identify greener solvents with solubility behavior similar to hazardous solvents. This approach is validated through case studies on benzene and diethyl ether, with predicted alternatives aligning well with known greener substitutes. Building on this success, novel alternatives are proposed for the hazardous solvents listed in the GSK SSG. This framework for quantifying solvent sustainability and identifying greener substitutes is expected to significantly accelerate the discovery and adoption of environmentally-friendly solvents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.