ArticleIntegrative zoology2026
Optimizing Lankesterella Detection in Avian Hosts: A Comparative Analysis of Microscopic and Molecular Techniques.
Article in Integrative zoology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Apicomplexan parasites in urban corvids: Presence ofCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lankesterella Labbe, 1899 is a genus of blood parasites found in reptiles, amphibians, and birds that has been poorly understood. In birds, it was originally classified as Hepatozoon Miller, 1908 or Atoxoplasma Garnham, 1905, but recent studies have revealed the diversity, prevalence, and host specificity of Lankesterella using integrative approaches, particularly the 18S rDNA gene. The introduction of new diagnostic protocols focusing on mitochondrial genes requires assessing the comparability of different diagnostic methods. This study aims to compare microscopy and molecular detection methods for Lankesterella spp. infections in wild birds, while also exploring the phylogenetic relationships inferred from different genetic markers. A total of 99 samples from nine passerine species were analyzed in a double-blind study using microscopy and PCR protocols targeting 18S rDNA, CytB, and COI. The overall Lankesterella sp. prevalence was 33%, with 17% detected by microscopy and 23% by molecular methods. In our study, the highest prevalences were found in European robins Erithacus rubecula (8.08%) and wrens Troglodytes troglodytes (9.09%). CytB detected the highest number of infections among the three used protocols, followed by COI, whereas 18S rDNA yielded the lowest detection rate. Only four samples were positive for all three genes and by microscopy. CytB and microscopy combined detected the highest number of infections, despite the low correspondence. Phylogenetic analysis confirmed high host specificity, with the best phylogenetic tree resolutions seen in COI and CytB. The study emphasizes the importance of using multiple methods, especially CytB and microscopy, to determine infection prevalence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.