Trial reportBrain : a journal of neurology2025
Boosting hemianopia recovery: the power of interareal cross-frequency brain stimulation.
Trial report in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Trans-Synaptic Retrograde Retinal Degeneration After Post-Chiasmatic Stroke: A Systematic Review of Empirical Evidence.European journal of neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Visuomotor training induces network reorganisation of frontal eye field and cuneus connectivity: A task-based fMRI study.Neuroimage. Reports · 2026Article
- Review of brain-computer interface technology in ophthalmology: Current status, challenges and future directions.Advances in ophthalmology practice and researchReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Visual field loss is a common consequence of stroke and manifests in approximatively one-third of patients in the chronic stage. Such loss can significantly impact daily life activities, compromising tasks such as reading, navigating or driving. Although slow and labour intensive, evidence suggests that early interventions with tailored rehabilitation programmes might stimulate visual recovery and improve quality of life in stroke survivors. To enhance the effects of such rehabilitation programmes, we designed a novel, non-invasive, pathway-specific, physiology-inspired cross-frequency brain stimulation protocol, where complex oscillatory signal integration was inferred from phase-amplitude coupling of oscillatory signals between the primary visual cortex and the motion-sensitive medio-temporal area. Sixteen stroke patients were enrolled in a double-blind, randomized, cross-over trial, during which they performed two blocks of 10 daily training sessions of a direction discrimination task, combined with one of the two cross-frequency transcranial alternative brain stimulation (cf-tACS versus control cf-tACS) conditions. We found that the cf-tACS condition promoting feedforward visual inputs to the medio-temporal area significantly enhanced motion discrimination performance and shifted visual field borders (i.e. through localized enlargement of isopters). Behavioural improvements associated with a change in oscillatory activity within motion processing pathways were proportional to the amount of residual structural fibres along these pathways and perilesional primary visual cortex activity. In sum, we report, for the first time, that cf-tACS, a novel, pathway-specific, physiology-inspired brain stimulation approach, is able to boost the efficacy of perceptual training, restoring visual motion processing and reducing the severity of visual impairments in adult stroke patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.