ArticleBMC oral health2025
In vitro comparison of root canal obturation quality in primary molars using lentulo spiral and reverse rotary techniques with zinc oxide eugenol and endoflas: microcomputed tomography analysis.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrimary teeth are necessary for mastication, speech, and guiding the eruption of permanent teeth. Dental caries often requires pulpectomy treatment to preserve these teeth. The success of pulpectomy depends on root canal obturation quality. This study aimed to compare the filling quality of zinc oxide-eugenol (ZOE) and Endoflas using lentulo and reverse rotary techniques, assessed by micro-computed tomography.
methodsAn in vitro study was conducted on 32 extracted human primary mandibular second molars. Teeth were randomly divided into four groups (n = 8) based on obturation material (ZOE or Endoflas) and technique (lentulo spiral or reverse rotary file). After standard canal preparation, obturation was performed. Micro-computed tomography assessed the quality of obturation by measuring the percentage of void and filling volume. Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) test (p < 0.05).
resultsThe lowest total void percentage was observed in the (ZOE + Lentulo) group (22.61 ± 9.00), and the highest in the (Endoflas|+Lentulo) group (35.97 ± 5.90). ZOE obturation resulted in lower voids (24.09 ± 8.50) compared to Endoflas (30.70 ± 8.50). The reverse rotary technique showed non significant lower voids (25.50 ± 7.60) than Lentulo (29.29 ± 10.10) (p = 0.181). A significant interaction effect was observed between material and technique in term of total voids (p = 0.021). (ZOE + Lentulo) group showed the highest filling volume (76.50 ± 9.10), while (Endoflas + Lentulo) had the lowest (64.02 ± 5.90). ZOE yielded higher filling volume (75.47 ± 8.50) compared to Endoflas (69.22 ± 8.50), with a significant material effect (p = 0.034), but no significant effect of technique (p = 0.138).
conclusionZOE + Lentulo technique provided the most root canal obturation quality, while Endoflas + Lentulo showed the least quality. The root canal filling quality was more influenced by the obturation material than the technique used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.