Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41243085›Full record

ArticleAdministration and policy in mental health2026

The Potential Role of Peer Support Workers in General Practice: Perspectives of Consumers, Carers, Peer Support Workers and General Practice Staff.

Sharon Lawn, Megan Rattray, Belinda Fuss, Tania Shelby-James, Louise Byrne, Paul Worley, Sam Manger, Geoff Harris, Bill Guy, Amaya Alvarez and 7 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Administration and policy in mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Sharon LawnFlinders University (College of Medicine and Public Health), Adelaide, Australia. Sharon.lawn@flinders.edu.au.
Megan RattrayFlinders University (College of Medicine and Public Health), Adelaide, Australia.
Belinda FussFlinders University (College of Medicine and Public Health), Adelaide, Australia.
Tania Shelby-JamesFlinders University (College of Medicine and Public Health), Adelaide, Australia.
Louise ByrneYale (School of Medicine), New Haven, USA.
Paul WorleyRiverland Mallee Coorong Local Health Network, Murray Bridge, Australia.
Sam MangerJames Cook University (School of Medicine), Brisbane, Australia.
Geoff HarrisMental Health Coalition of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Bill GuyCommunity Mental Health Australia, Canberra, Australia.
Amaya AlvarezTANDEM, Melbourne, Australia.
Daya HenkelMental Health Commission of NSW, Sydney, Australia.
Paul CreedonSkylight Mental Health, Adelaide, Australia.
Tony StevensonMental Illness Fellowship of Australia, Brisbane, Australia.
Vivian IsaacCharles Sturt University, Albury, Australia.
Billy KaambwaFlinders University (College of Medicine and Public Health), Adelaide, Australia.
Shahid UllahFlinders University (College of Medicine and Public Health), Adelaide, Australia.
Caroline PheganRiverland Mallee Coorong Local Health Network, SA Health, Renmark, Australia.

Funding

The Australian Government Medical Research Future Fund - Consumer-Led Round 2022527
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary care (general practice) clinics play a significant role in ongoing mental health care and assessment, treatment, and referral of people experiencing distress. Peer support workers (PSWs) are part of the growing Lived Experience workforce in many mental healthcare settings and evidence for their value is growing rapidly. Yet, this workforce is largely absent from primary care. Qualitative interviews with 10 consumers, six family carers, eight PSWs, and 14 general practice doctors, nurses and administrative staff occurred prior to a real-world trial and explored their perceptions of the potential benefits of introducing a PSW intervention for people who seek help for their mental health within primary care in Australia. Interview data were analysed thematically using Braun and Clark's six-step guide, following an inductive approach. Four themes were identified: (1) offering companionship, validation, and hope; (2) sharing learnings and providing practical support; (3) aiding in communication and offering consistency to help address service system gaps and health service navigation; and (4) redistributing power and advocacy. There was strong agreement across interviewees about potential positive impacts that PSWs could have in enhancing mental health care in primary care. These benefits require testing within primary care, given known challenges with awareness and understanding of the PSW role by other health professional disciplines in mental health settings, and differences related to how peer support and primary care practice are delivered. Overall, these perspectives and the existing evidence suggest that peer support may lead to more responsive, safe, effective, and person-centred primary mental health care.

Indexed as

CaregiversGeneral PracticeMental Health ServicesPeer GroupSocial SupportAdultAgedAustraliaFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchEarly interventionLived experienceMental healthPeer support workersPrimary careQualitative

Identifiers

PMID41243085
PMCPMC13009013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.