SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2025
Lower urinary tract symptoms after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is a minimally invasive treatment for localized prostate cancer, offering potential advantages in urinary functional recovery beyond oncological control. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated functional outcomes after RARP, focusing on lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), continence, and quality of life. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was conducted in accordance with PRISMA. Eligible studies were randomized trials or observational cohorts with ≥ 200 RARP patients, published in the last 10 years, assessing LUTS with validated instruments. Two reviewers independently performed data extraction and quality assessment. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool symptom scores and continence outcomes. Eighteen studies with 16,207 patients were included. Postoperative improvements in LUTS were observed, mainly measured by the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Pooled analysis showed mean IPSS reductions of - 2.84 (95% CI: - 3.92 to - 1.76; p < 0.00001) at 12 months and - 1.53 (95% CI: - 2.13 to - 0.92; p < 0.0001) at 6 months. Urinary continence recovery demonstrated a progressive trajectory across studies, with reported rates ranging approximately from 40 to 50% at 1 month to nearly 90% by 12 months. Specialized techniques, such as Retzius-sparing RARP and periurethral reconstruction, were frequently associated with earlier continence recovery. Quality of life related to urinary symptoms showed improvement, particularly in patients with higher preoperative severity and larger prostates. RARP is associated with progressive continence recovery and significant improvements in LUTS, ultimately leading to enhanced urinary-related quality of life. Functional recovery appears to be influenced by surgical techniques, preoperative symptom severity, and patient characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41243047What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.