Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41243013›Full record

SynthesisEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Multichannel machine learning for polysomnographic diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea: a Bayesian meta-analysis.

Shahana Rani, Esther Yanxin Gao, Joel Zuo Er Ong, Nicole Kye Wen Tan, Adele Chin Wei Ng, Zhou Hao Leong, Chu Qin Phua, Thun How Ong, Leong Chai Leow, Guang-Bin Huang and 2 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic ReviewReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Shahana Rani *Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-1619-5917
Esther Yanxin Gao *Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2311-7845
Joel Zuo Er Ong *Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-1131-6591
Nicole Kye Wen TanYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2597-9142
Adele Chin Wei NgDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4203-0972
Zhou Hao LeongDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1390-6445
Chu Qin PhuaSingHealth Duke-NUS Sleep Centre, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4434-8258
Thun How OngSingHealth Duke-NUS Sleep Centre, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9753-2000
Leong Chai LeowSingHealth Duke-NUS Sleep Centre, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3384-4854
Guang-Bin HuangSchool of Automation, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2480-4965
Benjamin Kye Jyn TanYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. benjamintankyejyn@u.nus.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9411-6164
Song Tar TohYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. toh.song.tar@singhealth.com.sg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2077-2457

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObstructive sleep apnea (OSA) affects 1 billion people globally, yet over 80% remain undiagnosed. The gold standard for diagnosis, overnight polysomnography, is highly accurate but labor-intensive, leading to delays and increased healthcare burden. Artificial intelligence (AI) models offer a promising alternative. This study pools existing evidence to evaluate AI-based OSA diagnostics.

methodsA systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore identified studies comparing AI models against the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) for OSA diagnosis. Studies evaluating models using random-split test sets or k-fold cross-validation were included in a Bayesian bivariate meta-analysis and meta-regression. Risk of bias and evidence quality were assessed using QUADAS-2 and GRADE.

resultsFrom 6,254 records, 7 studies with 19 AI models trained and tested on 7,547 and 7,471 participants were included. No study had a high risk of bias. AI achieved a pooled sensitivity of 89.2% (95% CrI: 81.5-94.3%) and specificity of 87.1% (95% CrI: 82.6-90.8%). Neural networks (NNs) were the best-performing AI model compared to the other subtypes, achieving a sensitivity of 92.8% (95% CrI: 84.8-96.6%) and specificity of 87.8% (95% CrI: 81.1-92.6%). Age and sex had no effect. No publication bias was detected, and the evidence was of high quality.

conclusionNeural Networks AI models trained on polysomnography demonstrated excellent diagnostic accuracy in diagnosing OSA as compared to traditional machine learning. There is a need for further exploration and external validation of AI models to support their integration into routine sleep medicine practice, hence improving access to efficient and accurate OSA diagnosis. PROSPERO registration: CRD42024534235.

Indexed as

Machine LearningPolysomnographySleep Apnea, ObstructiveBayes TheoremHumansArtificial intelligenceDeep learningMachine learningPolysomnography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.