ArticleNeuroscience2026
Neuro-cortical signatures of attention in uni- and multi-sensory audio-visual processing in children.
Article in Neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Attentional modulation of multisensory integration across the cortical hierarchy.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ability of the brain to integrate information from multiple sensory modalities is essential for forming coherent perceptions of the environment. Attention plays a critical role in binding or segregating neural activity to generate unified perceptual experiences. However, the mechanisms by which attention modulates sensory responses remain unclear. We hypothesized that children with low attention would exhibit reduced amplitude and delayed latency in sensory processing regions across modalities. Data were analyzed from 72 typically developing children (ages 9-14), grouped into high-attention (N = 33) and low-attention (N = 39) groups using Conners 3-P inattention scores. Participants performed an audio-visual multisensory task while MEG data were recorded using a 306-channel MEGIN Neuromag system. Preprocessing and source analysis were conducted in Brainstorm. Task-evoked source activity was quantified by analyzing amplitude and latency in predefined cortical regions and time windows (P1: 100-240 ms; P2: 240-400 ms) using multivariate analysis. High-attention participants showed significantly (p < 0.05) greater amplitude in visual cortex across P1 and P2 time windows. The low-attention group showed delayed latency in visual cortex (P2) and auditory cortex (P1). Significant three-way interactions (attention, hemisphere, sensory condition) were found in visual-cortex amplitude and auditory-cortex latency at P1, where low-attention group showed reduced amplitude and delayed latency, respectively. Inferior parietal cortex showed a significant two-way interaction (attention, condition) in response latency at P2, with post hoc tests confirming low-attention group showed delayed latency during multisensory responses. Attention significantly influences sensory processing, affecting both response strength and timing, with implications for interventions targeting attention-related sensory difficulties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.