ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology2026
Population differences in Merkel cell carcinoma by virus status and anatomic site: A multi-cohort analysis including institutional, SEER, and NCDB data.
Article in Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Skeletal muscle invasion identifies aggressive merkel cell carcinomas beyond tumor size-based risk stratification: a tertiary cancer center experience.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Article
- Anatomical lymphatic drainage basin and sentinel lymph node positivity in Merkel cell carcinoma: a 37-year single-center cohort study of 400 patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe impact of race/ethnicity on Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) outcomes remains inconclusive.
objectiveTo examine associations between MCC primary site, virus status, environmental ultraviolet radiation (UVR), and race/ethnicity.
methodsPatients diagnosed with MCC at the University of Washington (UW), in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER-17), in National Cancer Database (NCDB), and global incidence and virus status data were included in this retrospective multi-cohort study. We estimated the prognostic effect of virus status using a Cox proportional hazards model, conducted a pooled analysis of tumor site and virus status, and investigated racial/ethnic differences in site using SEER and NCDB. We also estimated global MCC viral subtype incidences and assessed their association with geographic UV indices.
resultsVirus-positive MCC (VP-MCC) showed improved survival compared to virus-negative MCC (VN-MCC) (P < .001) and was more likely to develop on UV-protected skin (P < .001). Black and Hispanic patient tumors were more likely to present on UV-protected sites (P < .001). Globally, UVR had a bigger effect on VN-MCC incidence than VP-MCC. LIMITATIONS: Nonstandardized virus assays, unknown patient migration histories, incomplete global data, and registry selection bias.
conclusionBlack and Hispanic patients more often develop MCC on UV-protected sites, which are more likely VP-MCC and associated with improved outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.