ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2025
Improved accuracy for myocardial blood flow mapping with deep learning-enabled CMR arterial spin labeling (DeepMASL): Validation by microsphere in vivo.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Spatially and temporally resolved assessment of quantitative skeletal muscle perfusion with non-contrast MRI in patients with PAD and healthy controls.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCurrent myocardial arterial spin labeling (ASL) methods are sensitive to noise (background and physiology), which limits the accuracy of myocardial blood flow (MBF) measurement. In this study, we demonstrated a new deep learning-enabled myocardial ASL approach (DeepMASL) and evaluated its accuracy to quantify MBF in a canine model of coronary arterial disease in vivo. The reference method was invasive microsphere measurements.
methodsEighteen mongrel dogs were divided into two groups: healthy (n = 9) and coronary stenosis (n = 9). The latter was induced in an open-chest model with 3 types of stenosis: 50% (n= 3), 70% (n = 3), and 90% (n = 3). Each dog received pharmaceutically induced hyperemia, by the infusion of either dipyridamole or dobutamine to induce different levels of MBF. Microsphere measurements were performed at rest and during the hyperemia. A cardiac ASL sequence was employed to acquire ASL signals at the mid-section of the heart, at rest and during the hyperemia. A physics-based deep learning network (DeepMASL) was developed using synthetic ASL signals with different levels of background noise. Segmented MBF values produced by both non-DeepMASL and DeepMASL methods were measured in all dogs to compare with segmented microsphere MBF values.
resultsWhile the non-DeepMASL method severely underestimated hyperemic MBF by 33-49%, the DeepMASL approach dramatically improved the accuracy to obtain error less than 10%. There were strong correlations (r = 0.85 - 0.86) in segmented MBF values between measurements by DeepMASL and microsphere methods in either normal or ischemic dogs with varying degrees of coronary artery stenosis. The Bland-Altman analysis revealed mild to moderate variations of DeepMASL (95% confident interval: -1.3 to 1.5 ml/min/g in normal dogs and -1.8 to 1.3 ml/min/g in stenotic dogs) and almost zero bias.
conclusionThe novel DeepMASL demonstrates much improved accuracy in the quantification of regional MBF at varying levels of coronary artery stenosis, which is correlated strongly with microsphere MBF values. The validated data indicates the potential for this DeepMASL technique to be translated for noncontrast diagnosis of myocardial perfusion deficit in a clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.