Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41241916›Full record

ArticleThe Libyan journal of medicine2025

Personal and work-related factors that impact the decision to have the first and recurrent abortion among women in Serbia.

Tatjana Gazibara, Natasa Maksimovic, Jadranka Maksimovic, Lidija Tulic, Jovan Bila, Jelena Stojnic, Maja Miloradovic, Dragana Plavsa, Milos Radovic, Katarina Maksimovic and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Libyan journal of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tatjana GazibaraInstitute of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Natasa MaksimovicInstitute of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Jadranka MaksimovicInstitute of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Lidija TulicClinic for Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Jovan BilaClinic for Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Jelena StojnicClinic for Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Maja MiloradovicInstitute of Hygiene and Medical Ecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Dragana PlavsaInstitute of Public Health of Serbia "Milan Jovanovic Batut", Belgrade, Serbia.
Milos RadovicClinic for Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Katarina MaksimovicFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Jelena DotlicClinic for Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the wide availability of contraception, the abortion rate in Serbia remains high. Being in a steady relationship and perceiving low risk to catch sexually transmitted infections have been identified as the most common reason to not use condom, while around 11% of females used oral contraceptive pill. The study aim was to investigate the reasons of Serbian women to seek induced abortion as well as the factors that might impact the decision to terminate pregnancy. A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Clinic for Ob/Gyn, University Clinical Centre of Serbia in Belgrade, which is a referral public tertiary health care institution. Women who underwent induced abortions from 2022 to 2024 filled in a questionnaire on socio-demographic characteristics, life-style and habits, medical history and motives for an induced abortion. Multivariate regression models were used to identify factors associated with each reported abortion motive. The study analyzed 433 women aged 16 to 49 years (mean 32.0 years). The most common motives for abortion were already having enough children (44.3%) and financial difficulties for child upbringing (42.0%). In contrast, gaining weight and concerns about physical changes due to pregnancy was the least endorsed reason for seeking an abortion. The majority of women (52.9%) reported multiple motives for abortion. Motives were generally the same for women who the first and recurrent abortion. Most common factors influencing the decision to terminate pregnancy were not being in a relationship or marriage and vigorous physical activity at workplace. One-half of women had multiple motives for abortion and more than 50% of women sought abortion multiple times. The most important factors associated with voluntary abortion seeking is not having a steady partner and working in a physically demanding job. These findings should be considered in the public health policy agenda.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedDecision MakingAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMotivationPregnancySerbiaSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAbortioncontraceptionmotivesphysical workprevention

Identifiers

PMID41241916
PMCPMC12621329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.