ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2026
Translation Signature Scores: Data-Driven Approach to Assess Evidence for Active Translation.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An expanded reference catalog of translated open reading frames for biomedical research.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microproteins encoded from small open reading frames (smORFs) in the human genome have long been hypothesized to play physiological and regulatory roles, but they have historically been excluded from genome annotations due to the challenges in their identification. The advent of ribosome profiling (Ribo-seq), a deep sequencing technology to capture genome-wide translation, has surfaced thousands of novel ORFs with the potential to encode previously unannotated microproteins. However, due to variability in data quality and sparseness in read coverage, distinguishing truly translated smORFs from background noise remains challenging. While there are many approaches to address these challenges, here we describe the translation signature approach. This approach utilizes large-scale pooled Ribo-seq data to enable visualization of translation in individual ORFs with unprecedented clarity as compared to individual samples. It then quantifies evidence of translation by using translation signature scores, which include three metrics, namely, P-sites in frame, uniformity, and drop-off. Lastly, annotated protein-coding ORFs are used as a reference to learn the expected range of the translation signature scores reflecting active translation and novel ORFs with such scores are prioritized. We summarize here the key data resources and methods, as well as essential considerations for conducting such an analysis. Additionally, we describe a web resource hosting the default set of smORFs generated using the described workflow. With an increasing volume of high-quality Ribo-seq datasets, the translation signature scores provide a robust framework to prioritize ORFs with strong evidence of translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41241902What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.